[Don Joe]

1. This did not originate from WND.
2. You have NOT pissed and moaned about the source that did initially cover it -- the BMJ.
3. The source documents confirm the BMJ's findings.
4. You are on record as saying that essentially, your train of thought runs along the lines of Bush can do no wrong, therefore, if Bush supports it, it can't be wrong.

[Dane]

2. You have NOT pissed and moaned about the source that did initially cover it -- the BMJ

See reply #342.

[texasflower]

I know it didn't originate from WND. It came from BMJ and Farah adapted it to his purpose. (Spin)

The BMJ article did not have the same tone to it. It was not as sensational.

The source documents confirm part of BMJ's findings. That would be things like, yes, this study was in fact done.

But NOTHING in the source documents says that anyone will be forcibly evaluated and medicated.

Nothing.

I see that you still are having just a bit of reading comprehension trouble.

Where did I say that President Bush could do no wrong?

All I have indicated is my belief that President Bush is pro-human libery and personal freedom and as a result I don't believe he would support any measure like this.

That's not exactly an endorsement of EVERY single thing he does.

Now is it?