Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush to screen population for mental illness
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 21, 2004

Posted on 06/21/2004 10:19:15 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,081 next last
To: sheik yerbouty

Well of course you are speechless. Especially since we KNOW this is true and is represented correctly.

After all, we read it in an ARTICLE.

Read the initiative. Where does it say the public is going to be screened and drugged?

I can't believe so many intelligent people are reading this article and instantly believing it.


181 posted on 06/22/2004 1:04:00 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Az. Mike

Read the initiative and not just the damn article and just calm down.

The initiative does NOT say what the writer says it does.

Please, think for yourself.


182 posted on 06/22/2004 1:06:47 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thank you for posting that. I wish people would slow down and read what you posted and not pay attention to the fantasy of the writer of this article.

I am stunned to see so many people convinced that we are going to be led into dark rooms and put on drugs, just because this one guy says so.


183 posted on 06/22/2004 1:09:48 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
Will intrusive questions about the family be asked such as gun ownership, smoking, and drinking?

Of course, they will.

The point is that the President's people ought to get on top of this and ditch the idea of mass screenings loud and clear.

It seems to have been their idea, to some extent. Hope they ditch it, and fast.

184 posted on 06/22/2004 1:20:43 AM PDT by garandgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Mockingbird For Short

A psych patient that is well treated and medically supported will cost the taxpayers much less money.

The unnecessary ER visits and inpatient hospitalizations that those patients who are not well managed need would be dramatically cut down.

I would much rather pay a couple hundred dollars a month for medicine and another hundred for a doctor visit than to pay the several thousand dollars a month some of these patients cost in "emergency care" that will not help.

In my career, I was constantly having to take the same patients in to the ER over and over and over again.

Who pays? Medicaid. (taxpayers)

Give me the two hundred dollar a month bill any day over the alternative.


185 posted on 06/22/2004 1:22:48 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: DCPatriot

Excellent points.


186 posted on 06/22/2004 1:23:55 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert

Read the initiative please. Not the article.

It does NOT say anything at all about screening the population and putting everyone on drugs.


187 posted on 06/22/2004 1:29:42 AM PDT by texasflower (in the event of the rapture.......the Bush White House will be unmanned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: garandgal
Here's a link to the final report. It has all the length and complexity you've come to expect from a Federal Commission.

www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/reports.htm

This report is from July 2003. The BMJ article is from June 19, 2004.

Was this report just made available to the public?

188 posted on 06/22/2004 1:58:07 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

This had better be satire, until Bush is thinking he would like to see the radical, malignant, narcissistic leftists medication. Then I support this.


189 posted on 06/22/2004 1:58:49 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Howlin...Things like this make me NUTS! I may need his mental health initiative or take up drinking! I think he should just chill out or send Rove on an overdue vacation. I'm hoping it's NOT TRUE!!!!!


190 posted on 06/22/2004 2:22:43 AM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: not_apathetic_anymore
Do I want to oppose this based on it's cost, or do I want to oppose this just based on the program regardless of cost?

Do you want to oppose it, period, and mark yourself as someone worth observation?

You have something to hide tovarish?

Welcome to the USSA.

And yes, I will be casting a protest vote this November, come to think of it.

191 posted on 06/22/2004 2:23:26 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
This is idiotic.

Now now, thoughts like that are not... productive.

Please step to the front of the line. The doctor will see you now, citizen.

192 posted on 06/22/2004 2:24:14 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
This has to be a joke. How can I work for his re-election if this is true?

Only a lunatic would work for his reelection if this is true.

The good news is that it would save the taxpayers the cost of the examination.

193 posted on 06/22/2004 2:25:31 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
And do you like what they named it --- The New Freedom Initiative

Modern Orwellism at werk. Here in the PRoMichigan, they renamed the DSS -- that's the agency that breaks up families and places people into longterm dependency on the state. The new name? Why, they named it, "The Family Independence Agency", of course.

194 posted on 06/22/2004 2:27:59 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: murdoog
Has Bush lost his mind?

No, just his job. (A natural consequence of losing his constituency.)

Someone must have told him that the Mexican Amnesty didn't do the trick. This ought to do the job, though. I sure hope so. I'd hate to think of what they'd have to come up with if it doesn't.

195 posted on 06/22/2004 2:29:41 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Howlin
America doesn't need another test for mental illness- we already have a big one scheduled for the first Tuesday this November.

We could just dispense free coupons for mental health services when you check 'Rat on any of the questions.

196 posted on 06/22/2004 2:31:41 AM PDT by RobFromGa (The Four Pillars of America; Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
This is f-ed up bigtime. Does Bush want to keep every freedom-loving voter home on election day?

Of course. What better way to find out who the "real" nutcases are? (in the "sovietest" of meanings).

Trick 'em. :) Go vote. I know I sure will. Not "R", and not "D", that's for sure. But, I'll vote.

I knew this country was headed down the crapper, but I didn't expect to see Our Glorious Leaders jackhammering the plunger on it. Ya learn something every day, I guess.

197 posted on 06/22/2004 2:32:44 AM PDT by Don Joe (We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I can't believe a Republican administration has proposed such an abomination.

I'm glad you didn't say conservative administration.

198 posted on 06/22/2004 2:34:20 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

This necessary measure is long overdue - judging from the recent polls nearly half of the country is losing it!


199 posted on 06/22/2004 2:34:59 AM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobFromGa

heh -- well said.


200 posted on 06/22/2004 2:35:39 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 1,081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson