Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Both Newsweek and NYTimes reviews of Clinton's book were on the negative side. Neither seemed to appreciate the writing skills Rather apparently found in the book.

The BBC interview (to be broadcast 6-22) apparently has Clinton getting mad and steaming off.

Never a dull moment when the Clintons are on center stage.

[Not sure I'll waste the time to watch the 60 Minutes Clinton love-in-fest.]


26 posted on 06/20/2004 3:33:26 PM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy

NYT book review:

'950 pages, is sloppy, self-indulgent
and often eye-crossingly dull'


32 posted on 06/20/2004 3:34:46 PM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

Other than Dan Rather, no one has had one kind word to say about this book or it's supposed author.


80 posted on 06/20/2004 3:55:08 PM PDT by OldFriend (LOSERS quit when they are tired/WINNERS quit when they have won)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
"The BBC interview (to be broadcast 6-22) apparently has Clinton getting mad and steaming off."

We've been suckered by that before. The Clinton lie-fest to the grand jury was supposed to be that way also and it wasn't.

Fool me once, shame on you....fool me twice, shame on me!

471 posted on 06/20/2004 5:03:40 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (Stir the pot...don't let anything settle to the bottom where the lawyers can feed off of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson