CNN will never question Russia's statements. Putin, of course, is more honest that our President according to News Reporting 101, as published by CNN.
Most of us knew the 9/11 report would be junk that it is just by looking at the CRATS questions during the hearings. Crap is Crap! What the Republicans need to do is start the attack.
If these Russian Reports are true then "imminent threat" was correct. Russia wouldn't falsify intelligence reports knowing an action would ruin their oil contracts with Iraq. They would most likely give us good intelligence in hopes to preserve their contracts.
The 911 commission wouldn't be able to find a credible link between Lee Harvey Oswald and RJack Ruby even if they'd been standing there when Ruby shot Oswald< so it's no surprise that they cannot find any link between anyone else.
*sigh*
And it's oddd that Putin is saying that he warned us about Sadman, and yet he didn't want to commit any support to removing Sadman.
"However" as in, however Saddam wasn't involved in the 9/11 attacks, as the administration never claimed they were.
No western nation had access to the Iraqis like the Russians. They had armed them with most of their weapons.
Remember the reports of Russian generals who went to Iraq shortly before the war?
My bet is that these Russian reports of Iraqi involvement are dead on.
Why did we start the 9/11 commission when we already had Hans Blix?