[ICX]

Oh, a million apologies. Having never been to Chippendales, nor with any plans to attend in the future, I wouldn't know whether or not they actually get fully nude. Let me rephrase my rephrasing for your edification.

"The women went to Chippendales, a male revue where the dancers strip to their undergarments."

Whether or not the place is "classy" - on an absolute (or relative, as you seem to be fond of) basis is totally subjective and therefore irrelevant to the story. Additionally, it is sufficient to say that the dancers remove clothing down to their underwear. It is not necessary to provide descriptions of their bodies or how 'scanty' their underwear may or may not be. Those descriptions seem to be more for the edification of the author than the audience.

[monday]

"Oh, a million apologies. Having never been to Chippendales, nor with any plans to attend in the future, I wouldn't know whether or not they actually get fully nude."

If you had comprehended the article you wouldn't have to visit Chippendales to know they don't get fully nude. The purpose of news articles is to inform people of facts and details of which they may not be aware.

You seem to be upset that the article provides more information than you want. It is a silly complaint. My suggestion to you is, don't read articles about strip clubs, if you don't want to know anything about strip clubs.