Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TomGuy; carton253
Carton is correct. Roses lack an enzyme to produce a true blue rose. Closest color is lavendar. Your photo is doctored.

A recent pharmaceutical research accident yielded hope that a blue rose will soon be possible.

250 posted on 06/11/2004 6:47:23 AM PDT by NautiNurse (Missing Iraqi botulinum toxin? Look at John Kerry's face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies ]


To: NautiNurse

The other thing is that, in nature, THERE IS NO BLUE FOOD. And, blue-berries don't count, as they are purple. Isn't that something?


253 posted on 06/11/2004 6:49:07 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (Reagan was right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
How awesomely appropriate! Mr. Reagan came to Washington in a Whirlwind of sunshine and leaves in a Whirlwind of rain! HOW SYMBOLIC!
537 posted on 06/11/2004 7:45:21 AM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

To: NautiNurse
I thought I had heard somewhere that one of the reasons there are no blue roses is that bees can't see the color blue...?

Then again, I could be off my rocker.

1,705 posted on 06/11/2004 9:08:16 AM PDT by Serb5150 (God Bless Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson