Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The search for the Higgs continues ...
1 posted on 06/10/2004 4:00:49 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro; jennyp; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Physicist; LogicWings; Doctor Stochastic; ..

Science list ping (a subset of the evolution list). FReepmail me to be added or dropped.


2 posted on 06/10/2004 4:01:50 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (God bless Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
The search for the Higgs continues ...

It was at my house eating chicken and dumplings last weekend.
Everyone definitely ended up more massive, so we're sure it was Higgs.

So9

4 posted on 06/10/2004 4:28:43 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (We are the Hegemon. We can do anything we damned well please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
...answering one of science’s great conundrums—what gives mass, mass?

A yet-to-be-discovered particle that I shall dub RosieOdonnelium.

5 posted on 06/10/2004 4:30:29 PM PDT by randog (Everything works great 'til the current flows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

There's no Top Quark really. Quarks belong to an autonomous hadronic commune.


6 posted on 06/10/2004 4:47:05 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
...what gives mass, mass?

Points, lines, angles, surfaces, and completing curves....causal units, portal units, form units, and structure units....aerogen, pyrogen, geogen, and fluogen....on-ness, in-ness, through-ness, and presence....and other stuff, including fuddle.

13 posted on 06/10/2004 9:40:54 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; Physicist

Hmmm. I'm a bit confused by this journalist's description of the Fermilab collisions. The article says that "When the accelerator smashes a quark and an anti-quark together, a top quark and an anti-top quark are occasionally created..." It was my understanding that free-standing quarks could not be created or observed; the amount of energy necessary to drag a quark out of another particle (due to the Strong force) would be enough to create another quark, so efforts to "liberate" quarks simply result in another composite particle. Did I miss something major, and do they actually have a collider that will accelerate and smash quarks? This has got to be journalist error...


16 posted on 06/11/2004 5:15:00 AM PDT by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (Physicists do it with Force and Energy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
That was an interesting question -- what gives mass it's mass?
it must rank along with others like -- what is the universe contained in?
22 posted on 06/12/2004 6:02:38 AM PDT by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson