To: Cableguy
This seems about right. Reagan may belong above Truman.
To: Bonaventure
Reagan needs to be ahead of Truman, but Truman was still a good president.
What exactly makes Jackson so great? Why do liberals like him?
Why is LBJ ranked so high? He needs to be dropped lower because despite the civil rights legislation he signed, he screwed the country up in everything else he did.
Why is Cal Coolidge ranked so low? By all accounts he had a quiet, but successful presidency.
Jimmy Carter needs to be ranked at the bottom.
22 posted on
06/10/2004 9:05:19 AM PDT by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: Bonaventure
I don't know if I'd put FDR in 3rd place, and I don't think Truman was of nearly same stature as Reagan.. but other than that, in general the list seems pretty good.
43 posted on
06/10/2004 9:14:44 AM PDT by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: Bonaventure
I don't know if I'd put FDR in 3rd place, and I don't think Truman was of nearly same stature as Reagan.. but other than that, in general the list seems pretty good.
45 posted on
06/10/2004 9:14:55 AM PDT by
HamiltonJay
("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
To: Bonaventure
Reagan should be above FDR. I wouldn't even consider FDR to be a great president.
97 posted on
06/10/2004 9:41:46 AM PDT by
Dr. Marten
(I donated to the Demcratic Party today, but I forgot to flush it down the toilet....)
To: Bonaventure
189 posted on
06/10/2004 3:00:05 PM PDT by
Dead Dog
(Expose the Media to Light, Expose the Media to Market Forces.)
To: Bonaventure
Reagan may belong above Truman. Reagan didn't nuke anybody. Truman did.
194 posted on
06/10/2004 3:11:48 PM PDT by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson