Posted on 06/04/2004 4:11:24 PM PDT by ambrose
Muslim GI gets 14 months for avoiding duties in Iraq
By Rick Emert, Stars and Stripes European edition, Saturday, June 5, 2004
BAMBERG, Germany - A 1st Infantry Division Engineer Brigade soldier who refused to deploy to Iraq citing religious beliefs was sentenced Thursday to 14 months' confinement and given a bad-conduct discharge.
During his court-martial, Sgt. 1st Class Abdullah Webster, 38, pleaded guilty to two counts of disobeying a lawful order from a superior commissioned officer and one count of missing movement.
When his unit was deploying on Feb. 8, Webster - the battalion security noncommissioned officer - told his leaders he would not deploy based on guidance he received from Muslim clerics.
Prosecutors Maj. Vince Vanek and Capt. Catherine Cunningham asked government witnesses about the effect Webster's refusal to deploy had on the unit.
Maj. David Kennedy, executive officer of the 82nd Engineer Battalion when Webster was assigned to the unit, said the refusal had only a modest effect on the unit because it distracted soldiers from their missions.
But Command Sgt. Maj. John S. Gioia, the 82nd Engineer Battalion's top NCO, said the unit in Iraq is now short-handed.
"We are a battalion covering a brigade combat team-sized sector," Gioia said as he testified via telephone from Iraq. "It has had a significant impact on the unit."
Gioia also said some soldiers had reservations of deploying with Webster, who converted to Islam in 1994 after returning from Operation Desert Storm.
Gioia brought up an incident in which Sgt. Asan Akbar, a Muslim soldier assigned to the 101st Airborne Division, allegedly threw a grenade into a tent killing one U.S. soldier and wounding a dozen more in March 2003.
"Some of the soldiers, when Webster didn't go, were saying: 'This is great, now we can do our job without having to watch our backs,'" Gioia testified.
Also testifying via telephone from Iraq, engineer brigade commander Col. William Haight III said Webster was "truly struggling" with his responsibilities to the Army and to his religion.
"His reputation is solid," Haight said. "The problems were when we had missions in Muslim countries; that's when he started drawing the line."
However, several witnesses testified that Webster deployed to Kosovo, a largely Muslim country, and that he carried a weapon. But the battalion commander during the Kosovo deployment, Lt. Col. Thomas Quigley, said Webster never had to go on a security patrol there.
Quigley also agreed with defense attorney Capt. Christopher Ryan that the situations in Kosovo and Iraq were far different, with the former being a peace enforcement mission and the latter being an all-out war.
Air Force Chaplain (Capt.) Hamza Al-Mubarak, an imam based at Ramstein Air Base, testified for the defense that Webster had done the right thing.
Al-Mubarak said Webster consulted several Muslim scholars, and that he chose not to deploy because the clerics said it would be better for him to die than to bear arms against fellow Muslims.
"I would not say he's an extremist," Al-Mubarak testified during cross-examination. "He was adhering to the sincere advice of the scholars. It is not permissible for him to take up arms and kill another Muslim.
"It would be better for him that he was killed than to pick up arms against anyone."
Webster had prepared a conscientious objector packet, but it was disapproved at the unit level. It has advanced to the 1st Infantry Division level, and if disapproved there, it will go to the Army level.
But Webster does not qualify as a conscientious objector, because he was not opposed to all wars, only wars in Muslim nations, Quigley said.
In closing remarks, Cunningham asked Hall to ignore the fact that Webster was a senior NCO with 18 years of service. Webster faced a maximum prison term of five years.
"Duty called; he didn't answer," she said. "There is a message to be sent. You cannot look at rank in this case."
Why do we even have Muslims serving in our army? Who do they pledge their allegiance to?
Has al-Qaeda heard about this? Nah...
If they won't fight fellow muslims, throw them all out of the armed services, NOW! Dishonorable Discharge, dammit!
I would have socked him with actions prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the unit and thrown on another 6 months of breaking rocks.
Big Chicken Dinner Bumps !
The moon-god called Allah. (May piss be upon him)
There is no god but allah, and mohammad is his profit, uh, prophet.
I don't exactly advocate that, but he is getting what he's got coming. An Army E-7, losing his career, rank, and his retirment pay. If he is 38, he probably has near 20 years in the Army, and NO retirement pay for him.
14 months in prison sounds pretty soft to me. People will have a choice in fighting in a war or stay 14 months in prison. You may get a bad conduct discharge, but the politically correct crowd will say your a victim, help you to get financial aid to go through school and help you get a federal job somewhere.
Let's make this easy -- they shouldn't be allowed in OUR country -- period.
Islam is incapable of loyalty to the United States of America.
What a chump. After he's served his time in the big house, I hope he leaves the US and never comes back.
You want to give him "credit" for not strapping a bomb to his torso and taking out the entire battalion while you're at it?
Muslims are a liability to the life of ANYTHING they touch.
Who says he has to take up arms? Send him out on patrol, put him on point unarmed and let him draw fire from his Jihadist brothers. Betcha he'd be scrambling around for a weapon double-quick.
>It is not permissible for him to take up arms and kill another Muslim.
??????
Then how did Iran and Iraq go to war? How did Saddam kill millions of his own people?
DASTAP!
Bad mufti.
Actually, they should sentence him to Leavenworth for the remainder of his term. Every 4 years he had to sign a contract with the U.S. to remain in the military, unless he extends for the 23 maximum months. He broke the contract and should be an E-1 with a dishonorable discharge while serving his time out in prison.
Who says he has to take up arms? Send him out on patrol, put him on point unarmed and let him draw fire from his Jihadist brothers. Betcha he'd be scrambling around for a weapon double-quick.
Let him be the first driver in a convoy. That way if one of his loving brethren has set an IED for our guys he will get his wish of being killed instead of killing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.