To: rdb3; mhking
I've got a little secret to share with you here. When I stumble across posts such as this, I immediately scroll down to look for the comments (if any) from you and Mr. King. This is my barometer; my means of measuring the validity (or lack thereof) of the author's comments. Like it or not, earned or not, I evaluate whats on the other side of the coin through your reaction, your honest measure of worth.
That said, I cannot disregard the fact that your point of view is unique (or so it would seem, given the cacophony of voices from the "politically correct" arena, for lack of a better term). I wish to be tactful and respectful toward persons on either side of the racial, political and ideological fence; it helps reasoned debate flourish if (perceived) epithets are not thrown about during a discussion, like so much refuse out the car window . . .
(By now you're thinking, "theres got to be a point in here somewhere".)
If I find a need to refer to color (race) in a discussion with the, ahem, sensitive persons in our midst, exactly what the hell term do I use this week that won't automatically piss people off? Damn, I need another linguistics lesson . . .
94 posted on
06/03/2004 9:12:04 AM PDT by
BraveMan
To: BraveMan
If I find a need to refer to color (race) in a discussion with the, ahem, sensitive persons in our midst, exactly what the hell term do I use this week that won't automatically piss people off? Damn, I need another linguistics lesson . . .No, you don't need any lessons. If you are talking to so-called "African-Americans," just say "black." Then you're safe.
102 posted on
06/03/2004 10:36:14 AM PDT by
rdb3
($710.96... The price of freedom.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson