[DoughtyOne]

If Moore has footage, you can bet the family home it wasn't positive footage with regard to the U.S. efforts in Iraq. Now I kindof wonder if this guy was thinking he was going to be a cause celeb with the terrorists, and that backfired on him. I feel sorry for the family.

[oldironsides]

Moore and Mr. Berg think alike. The footage of Nick Berg should be put away or given to the people trying to bring his killers to justice. I do not think Moore will turn in his killer chums. Moore reminds me of the outhouse at summer camp. Yeeeeeeeesh.

[Dr. Frank fan]

If Moore has footage, you can bet the family home it wasn't positive footage with regard to the U.S. efforts in Iraq.

How do you figure that? I figure the opposite, because he's not releasing it.

If it were somehow negative with regard to the U.S. efforts in Iraq, is there any real doubt that he'd release it immediately, the family be damned?

[Tamzee]

If Moore has footage, you can bet the family home it wasn't positive footage with regard to the U.S. efforts in Iraq.

I wondered about that... if it were negative against Bush I would have thought he'd release it immediately. But if it were positive and supporting Bush, why would the owner of the tape have given it to Moore? It's all very odd.

[Howlin]

"It is not in the film. We are dealing privately with the family."

Then why announce it, unless, of course, he and Michael Berg plan to use it against Bush.

[YaYa123]

Is even Michael Moore low down dirty enough to lie about something like this? I mean, this is really nasty business. He's a liar, but this isn't pulling a fast one on Michael Eisner, this is life and death.

Do I have this right? Moore is claiming to have somehow gotten hold of video of the captured Berg, video that was not used in the video released to the Arab tv channel. Am I also right that the only way he could have gotten it was from the Arab television channel, directly from the terrorists, or as he would no doubt claim, anonymously in the mail?

If I'm making the right assumption, then the question is why was he the one to get the video? Seems apparent, the video "source" thought he would be the one most likely to use it to help their cause.

So I'm thinking what on a Berg video would hurt us the most: To hear Berg denounce the president, the war, and the country. Even if done under torture, which could easily be edited out.

[Eva]

I have been thinking that for a while. It has been suggested that Berg might even had ties to George Soros, due to the name of his alleged business.

[San Jacinto]

I can't muster the slightest sympathy for Berg's family...or at least not for his scumbag father. The fact that Moore saw fit to film Berg for 20 minutes indicates to me that Berg was probably as anti-American as his father is.

I imagine it was Berg who sought out the terrorists and not vice versa. Yes, it seems to have backfired on him.