Well perhaps you are a paid attack dog of Richard Mellon Scaife, shilling for Bush on this board for a salary. Prove me wrong.
I don't actually believe that, but see how easy that slimy game is played. Cheap shot character assassinations are out of line, and that's what that is. Why not go one step further with the tinfoil, and accuse Clancy of being blackmailed by the Dems? Believe it or not, sometimes good people actually have a difference of opinion on tough issues, sometimes for no other reason than that is what they BELIEVE.
Certainly Clancy knew that supporting this book and coming on the show tonight is harmful to President Bush, so I am not thrilled with it, but OTOH I'm not going to throw him overboard just because I don't like what he said. He could have easily disparaged the President, saying that he couldn't vote for him(like so many other knee-jerk reactionary freepers cry from time to time), but he did not.
You don't know where I get my information anymore than you know where Clancy gets his.
Which is precisely why I am challenging your claiming that Clancy is a sellout. That's a serious charge.
If you don't know my statements to be untrue, then don't accuse me of such.
Nice try, but if you throw out something that sounds false, you are going to be challenged on it.This is FR, not the "Praise the Emperor's New Clothes Society."
I agree with a lot of what you post, but this is out of line. Hence I am calling you on it. Credibility is important, and there are way too many blowhard reactionaries constantly biting in whatever direction they hear something they don't like. Don't sink to that level.
Did I ever tell you that I really admire you for that? This seems to be the only way to win the war against those who are compromised! (And the list gets longer by the day)