Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Stantongoes on to write: “The court would have us believe your wife’s only essential value as a woman is her womb or your husband’s, his seed. That, they say, is the only unique thing we, as gendered-beings, bring to the table.

Yep, the homosexuals knock on Lot's door and demand the "dignity" to treat every person as if they're nothing more than a penis or a uterus. How tolerant and enlightened.

1 posted on 05/21/2004 8:07:12 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: agenda_express; BA63; banjo joe; Believer 1; billbears; Blood of Tyrants; ChewedGum; ...
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!

If anyone wants on or off my BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.

2 posted on 05/21/2004 8:09:25 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Pre-empt the third murder attempt: Pray for Terri Schindler-Schiavo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

Every child needs a father and a mother.

That's the purpose of marriage.


3 posted on 05/21/2004 8:19:25 AM PDT by rogueleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

bump


4 posted on 05/21/2004 9:19:49 AM PDT by tuesday afternoon (Honour thy father and thy mother, that thy days may be long upon the land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Ping


What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)


Myth and Reality about Homosexuality--Sexual Orientation Section, Guide to Family Issues"

5 posted on 05/21/2004 9:38:09 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback
Are children of gay parents worse off?
6 posted on 05/21/2004 9:42:46 AM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping - More on "Gay Parenting".

More proof that liberals/leftists are (criminally) insane. A quick summary of the article - when moral absolutes are rejected, then EVERYTHING that is true has to be rejected. All right and wrong, every natural law, must be ultimately be rejected.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this pinglist.


7 posted on 05/21/2004 9:56:12 AM PDT by little jeremiah ("Gay Marriage" - a Weapon of Mass. Destruction!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

In a heterosexual marriage, no group (male or female) is excluded. A homosexual marriage excludes half of the population--thus you could say they are exclusionary--maybe even phobic towards half of the population. It does not lead to a healthy, cohesive society.


30 posted on 05/22/2004 12:38:44 AM PDT by savagesusie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

If there's no real difference between men and women, then why are homosexual men only attracted to men and homosexual women only attracted to women. I mean, if there's no difference, why would they care at all whom they marry?


32 posted on 05/22/2004 11:40:38 AM PDT by inquest (The only problem with partisanship is that it leads to bipartisanship)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

Same-sex marriage is not about homosexuals. They'll use it, but they will be the minority of those who do.


35 posted on 05/22/2004 8:47:35 PM PDT by Nick Danger (With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Silverback

The huge problem is that so many children are born out of wedlock in the last 40 years.

I have the stats at home, but as I remember them:

Until approximately 1960, the out of wedlock birth ratio was under 6% - as high as 22% in some Black American communities.

By 1991, half of our births were outside marriage!

What is the change that enabled/caused the increase?


First, the separation of sex and procreation. Supposedly, the two became separate issues, and Surprise! Contraception didn't work.

Next, men took the separation more and more to heart. Some of it's the old "Why should he buy the cow,when he's getting the milk for free?" But, let's face it, the driver for promiscuous sex has always been the male.

Men are not all promiscuous, and many are begging for a chance to take responsibility and keep the traditional home. Far too many, however were/are thrilled with the concept that conception is "her problem." In addition, fatherhood is a mental process - rather than 9 months of gestation, as it is for women.

Nowadays, however, the States are demanding that men support their offspring - however they are conceived. Perhaps this will change the outlook of men.

Or to use a crude old saying, again: If he's paying for the feed, the barn and the upkeep, he might as well buy the cow.


40 posted on 05/24/2004 7:26:50 AM PDT by hocndoc (Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson