Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: menotyu

Its World War One techonology. You just read too many comic books or are easily freightened. Hardly a reson so send your own countrymen to their death, don't you think?


241 posted on 05/18/2004 1:44:43 PM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
Its World War One techonology.

LOL That's one of the dumbest things you've ever said. Phosgene and mustard gas are technologies from WWI, the implication of your statement is that they are not harmful either.

244 posted on 05/18/2004 1:48:15 PM PDT by Petronski (They could choose between shame and war: Some chose shame, but got war anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt

"Hardly a reson so send your own countrymen to their death, don't you think?"


Let me guess...you also think we got what we deserved on 9/11?


It's doesn't matter if it's CIVIL WAR technology it's still a dangerous chemical that had it gone off properly would have killed several THOUSAND people.

Maybe you' ve been reading too many pamphlets from the DNC lately.


245 posted on 05/18/2004 1:50:30 PM PDT by txradioguy (HOOAH!!!...Not Just A Word...A Way Of Life!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt

I think I see your problem (I mean other than the fact that you are a bigger snob than most liberals I've ever come across)...

You are either purposefully, or from sheer ignorance, leaving out the terrorism part of the equation to remove Hussein from power. The weapons themselves were not the major threat. It was the lengths Hussein was willing to go to in order to attack his enemies. It was who he was willing to harbor and train in the use of these chemicals / agents in order to inflict death and terror on the people he considered his enemies.

Are you one of those people who refuse to acknowledge that Hussein's removal from power is part of the war on terror?


247 posted on 05/18/2004 1:52:10 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt

Actually that's false it's WWII tech. Hmmmmm wonder when the gun was created I mean that technology is way out of date, couldn't possibly be an effective weapon, don't you think?


248 posted on 05/18/2004 1:54:27 PM PDT by menotyu (Smokin, trippin, drinkin never thinkin whats to be, Another day, another war has come to set me free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt; All

Time for the obvious question.

Who is John Galt?


293 posted on 05/18/2004 2:31:07 PM PDT by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt

And the nuclear bomb is WWII technology.


300 posted on 05/18/2004 2:38:07 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson