Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lady Heron; Poohbah

Chemical weapons lose their potency as they get older.

Newer stuff from the 2001-2003 timeframe would also show that Saddam Hussein was still attempting to maintain an arsenal of chemical weapons.


229 posted on 05/18/2004 1:14:40 PM PDT by hchutch ("Go ahead. Leave early and beat the traffic. The Milwaukee Brewers dare you." - MLB.com 5/11/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: hchutch
O.K. that makes some sense. So the next question is how long does is sarin potent for and why were we so anxious to get the last of Saddams stocks of it destroyed if it was degrading so fast? Were we not ourselves having a difficult time of destroying our own Chemical weapons left over from WWII and Vietnam? They are still potent enough to be very dangerous.
383 posted on 05/19/2004 3:29:51 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson