To: intenseracer
fox web site now leading with "Gallon of Sarin...". Can the NYT continue to ignore this?
To: epluribus_2
fox web site now leading with "Gallon of Sarin...". Can the NYT continue to ignore this? And not a SINGLE article on CNN.com about the find of Sarin in Iraq... There's a mention of an "artillery shell containing traces of deadly nerve gas" in an article about Bremer's eulogy for Izzy Salim. That's it.
119 posted on
05/18/2004 10:26:06 AM PDT by
So Cal Rocket
(Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
To: epluribus_2
Can the NYT continue to ignore this?
Of course they can. Stop cynically spinning the discovery of a "trace" of sarin to deflect attention from the attrocities routinely committed at Abu Graib. How can you morally equate the discovery of a "trace" of harmless pesticides to innocent "persons deprived of their liberty" being forced to wear women's underwear on their heads? You and Bush ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
/sarcasm
To: epluribus_2
If the shell exploded, I wonder how they knew a gallon of sarin was in it?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson