Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraq Artillery Shell Contained 3-4 Liters of Sarin
Fox News ^ | May 17, 2004

Posted on 05/18/2004 9:23:50 AM PDT by Living Free in NH

Breaking news ... nothing follows

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 155mm; nerveagent; nerveagents; organophosphate; organophosphates; sarin; sarinnerveagent; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 421-427 next last
To: nuffsenuff

Before the NSA or CIA comes after me... I meant "terrorism experts" not "terrorists experts"...

LOL!


261 posted on 05/18/2004 2:08:12 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

It's a tactical weapon but no doubt you probably do brown your shorts over such little things.


262 posted on 05/18/2004 2:08:29 PM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

"I think 'they hate us for our freedom.'"

After reading msot of your comments on here I'm not so worried that THEy hate us for our freedom as I am disturbed by the fact that YOU hate this country so much.

"The Chinese think your little war in Iraq is quite quaint BTW."

And you know this becasuse you have facts to back it up or becasue the little voices in your head tell you it's true?


263 posted on 05/18/2004 2:09:06 PM PDT by txradioguy (HOOAH!!!...Not Just A Word...A Way Of Life!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

Sarin not a WMD?! I have one word for you: Halabja.


264 posted on 05/18/2004 2:09:41 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

"Good news! Barbed wire no longer punctures skin"

Oh good, I was really worried about that. Silly me, I guess, since it is such ancient technology. I hear that the ancient substance water can no longer drown you. Ain't technology grand?


265 posted on 05/18/2004 2:09:51 PM PDT by brothers4thID (Saying Dr. Rice hadn't heard of Al Queda is like saying Dr. Ruth hadn't heard about sex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

I wouldn't worry about the NSA or CIA, but watch out for suspicious chinese...


266 posted on 05/18/2004 2:09:57 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
, the point is that sarin is not a weapon of mass destruction.

And you are wrong on that point

267 posted on 05/18/2004 2:10:17 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

So far what i saw on the ground over there with my own eyes proves cvhalibi was correct in his assessment of Iraq.

The only useful idiot/tool in here is you sir.


268 posted on 05/18/2004 2:10:38 PM PDT by txradioguy (HOOAH!!!...Not Just A Word...A Way Of Life!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

Umm, debt financing in the open market, means underwritten by the Chinese.

I am sure you know lots of gubmint paper shufflers/gubmint contractors who had a job prior to 9/11 and still have a job after 9/11. New wars are their meal ticket, and since they already stole from you to make a living, hmm...why would they lie to you? LOL


269 posted on 05/18/2004 2:10:44 PM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

Asked to explain your blather, you refuse, and depart with an insult. All I can say is wow.


270 posted on 05/18/2004 2:10:53 PM PDT by Petronski (They could choose between shame and war: Some chose shame, but got war anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

Sarin is not a weapon of mass destruction? You sir are blatantly wrong. It cannot be said more clearly. You are WRONG.

You have completely negated any credibility you had in this thread.


271 posted on 05/18/2004 2:11:47 PM PDT by brothers4thID (Saying Dr. Rice hadn't heard of Al Queda is like saying Dr. Ruth hadn't heard about sex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Knives date back to the Stone Age. But Americans are still getting beheaded by them. Must ban knives.


272 posted on 05/18/2004 2:12:46 PM PDT by ItsTheMediaStupid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion

How nuts is that Galt guy?

What's even nuttier is that I post on another board and there's another guy, just as smug, who also talks about this Chinese agenda conspiracy theory.

They both must frequent an obscure site that caters to people who are still stuck in the days of the cold war.

The Commies are coming! The Commies are coming!


273 posted on 05/18/2004 2:13:29 PM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy
The military doesn't protect my rights, that is my responsibility. And if it was your job, you are doing a lousy piece of work I might add. Each year, Americans have fewer 'rights' and worse, an army of real invaders from Mexico secured a capitulation from the DC-tax regime.

You are an enforcer for the DC-tax regime and the policy dreamed up by Ivy League dateless wonders.
274 posted on 05/18/2004 2:13:38 PM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

"It's a tactical weapon"


So are nuclear warheads and radiological "dirty" bombs. Or do those not fit your warped definition of WMD?

I'm seriously beginning to believe the ONLY smart Liberialtarian in the world is Neal Boortz.


275 posted on 05/18/2004 2:13:46 PM PDT by txradioguy (HOOAH!!!...Not Just A Word...A Way Of Life!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
It's a tactical weapon? So what? It's still a nerve gas. You think that means it can't also be a weapon of 'mass' destruction? It's a question of how it is deployed.

More insults sure inspire confidence in your views, though.

276 posted on 05/18/2004 2:14:33 PM PDT by Petronski (They could choose between shame and war: Some chose shame, but got war anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: txradioguy

In my definition, nuclear weapons are the only WMDs.

You probably think an automatic weapon is a WMD, or maybe even an archery set.


277 posted on 05/18/2004 2:15:34 PM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt

"No Mssr. Marx, the point is that sarin is not a weapon of mass destruction."
Your getting on my nerves Johnny Boy.


278 posted on 05/18/2004 2:16:15 PM PDT by Gucho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
No Mssr. Marx, the point is that sarin is not a weapon of mass destruction.

You're moving the goal posts, John. You've painted yourself into a corner and now appear to be desperate enough to challenge the lethality of Sarin. You realize you could apply that (non)logic to tactical nuclear weapons as well, right? I've a question for you: what weapon would count as a WMD? Would you recant your position if it was found?

279 posted on 05/18/2004 2:16:15 PM PDT by Shryke (Never retreat. Never explain. Get it done and let them howl.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Oh, so its a question of how its deployed...does it count then as a WMD if its in an artillery shell next to a road, I mean, IYO?


280 posted on 05/18/2004 2:16:52 PM PDT by JohnGalt (Chalabi Republicans: Soft on Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 421-427 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson