No controlled scientific studies support this. Most scientific studies, including the twin studies indicate that many other 'evironmental' and social factors have an affect on what 'turns us on' sexually and what 'turns of off' sexually.
When is the last time you were aroused by your brother or sister? The turn off is not genetic, it is the result of thousands of years of social/cultural conditioning.
Imagine a scenerio where hundreds of ‘BLUE’ people started petstering the courts and the government for special ‘protections’ and defined themselves as a RACIAL group. Meanwhile, the opposition makes claims that either they spray painted themselves or were in an environment that contibuted to their ‘blueness,’ so they should not qualify for special identity....
Wouldn’t the government or the judges call in renowed scientists and genetic experts to testify? Wouldn’t we expect a rational legal and scientic inquiry prior to court or government ruling?
Why have we skipped from 1973 over the research stage and final scientic findings into government and judicial action? It is not up to ‘head shrinkers’ to determine genetic findings...it’s up to scientists. We as a civilized society have been duped by a swarm of deviants who have in every sense ‘painted them selves blue,’ and the courts have bought off on a lower or non-exhistant standard of evidence.
Genetic Homosexuality is a hoax.
Notice when the scientific studies have FAILED to find the GAY GENE in humans, the argument of Gays retreat into: I didn’t ask to be like this! Who would ask to be born this way!
They would of course. When is the last time you heard of cries to the Government from the homosexual community to “...fund research to find a cure for this terrible affliction we were born with!?”
Think about this: if homosexuality was genetic, what 'normal' gene imprint would have a person sexually turned on by another persons annus?
Sorry, the 'I-like-your-butt-hole' Gene is a myth. It's not there...