Replies

An older article about Clinton. Should be read AGAIN if you saw it the first time:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=19269

Why not just let Bill Clinton win?

© 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

By the time you read this, 45 Senate Democrats, aided by perhaps a few Republicans, will have voted to accept Bill Clinton's Mafiosi techniques of political intimidation, witness tampering, lying under oath, obstruction of justice, and character assassination as "politics as usual" in America. God willing, their effort at dismissal will fail. Languishing in yet another House committee is a bipartisan report detailing treasonable charges of transferring technology that gives aid and comfort to the dictators in Communist China. And therein lies the magical word.

Bill Clinton's trial has never been about Bill Clinton. It is frequently, and wrongly, compared to Andrew Johnson's impeachment trial, but that is not the right model either. Bill Clinton is on trial because deep down inside his beliefs are at odds with America. Americans just don't know it, because as Sen. Bob Kerry has said, "Clinton's an exceptionally good liar."

Bill Clinton's trial is about something quite different: It's about a religion. Although their god is dead, its rotting carcass stinks on, the shell of a god still worshipped by America's deluded elites: gifted, godless traitors who control the nation's disgraced media, the ivy-league colleges in which they've replaced western civilization courses with queer studies, and a public school system where they've displaced the Christian God in whom we trust, with unfailing alliance to their all powerful, all-pervasive, godless government.

While he was busy pretending to be a Fulbright scholar, Bill Clinton made a leisurely trip to Moscow's Kremlin, where he was entertained. Shortly afterward, as a show of loyalty to his new faith, he organized demonstrations against the United States and the Vietnam war. Since he was a good liar, the draft board believed Mr. Clinton was studying at Oxford and sent another young man to die in his place in Vietnam.

There is a model for Bill Clinton's trial. The thread runs back through Watergate. Some of the players are even the same. Hillary Clinton knows, for she secured a bit part in the elites' witchhunt that destroyed Richard Nixon. Mrs. Clinton was one of the bright, young elites. Bill Clinton was bright, but he was never an elite. He simply carried their water. And why not? They were going in the same direction, and Clinton does the task exceedingly well. He's even cheap to keep -- provided his proclivities are catered to.

The trial that gave birth to Richard Nixon's Watergate also bore Bill Clinton's sex and perjury-gate. The charge was even the same: perjury. The defendant was Alger Hiss, the upper-crust of the Northeastern Liberal Elite. The trial wasn't even really about perjury. It was about Alger Hiss and his religion: the godless religion of redemption through government. Today, we call it Communism.

Hiss was a Communist spy. He betrayed America behind Roosevelt's back at Yalta, and countless other places. Tens of millions of Stalin's own citizens shivered and died in railroad cattle cars, entire families parked in the midst of the Russian winter, left to freeze to death. In his deluded mind, government became Alger Hiss' god; he busied himself betraying America to the Communist experience. Redemption through regulation. Worship of the elites. Hiss was finally discredited by Whittaker Chambers, Thomas Murphy, and Richard Nixon.

Watergate was never the real reason Nixon was hounded from office by the press and the Democrats. It was payback. As a young congressman, Richard Nixon performed the one unpardonable sin against America's godless elites: he destroyed Alger Hiss, and dealt a painful, wounding blow to their government-is-god religion.

A religion to die for. Its temples still remain in China: forced labor camps, "reeducation centers," Christian pastors jailed for their faith, families ripped apart by the police state, students crushed by Red Army tanks for speaking of democracy, prisoners making toys that American children snuggle up with at night.

Forty-five or more U.S. senators voted their faith and conscience, led by Robert Byrd: political intimidation, witness tampering, lying under oath, character assassination, and murder. Whatever it takes, to govern without God. Whatever it takes, to redeem the electorate and hang onto personal power. All hail king Clinton. Save us from political oblivion. Slay the evil Ken Starr. Give us eternal power. One nation, forever under corruption.

Listen to Whittaker Chambers, as he describes the end of the Alger Hiss Case:

"No feature of the Hiss Case is more obvious, or more troubling as history, than the jagged fissure, which it did not so much open as reveal, between the plain men and women of the nation, and those who affected to act, think and speak for them. It was, not invariably, but in general the 'best people' who were for Alger Hiss and who were prepared to go to almost any length to protect and defend him. It was the enlightened and powerful, the clamorous proponents of the open mind and the common man, who snapped their minds shut in the pro-Hiss psychosis, of a kind which, in an individual patient, means the simple failure of the ability to distinguish between reality and unreality, and in a nation is the warning of the end. ...
"But even when they did not understand, my people were always about me. I had only to look around me to see them -- on the farms, on the streets, in homes, in shops, in the day coaches of trains. My people, humble people, strong in common sense, in common goodness, in common forgiveness, because all felt bowed together under the common weight of life.

"At the very end of the Hiss Case, I heard their speaking voice, like themselves, anonymous, and speaking not to me as an individual, but to me in the name of all those who made the struggle.

"On the afternoon of January 21, 1950, one of the wire services first telephoned me in Maryland to say that the jury in New York had found Alger Hiss guilty of perjury as charged on both counts. I had not turned away from the phone before it rang again. An excited voice, apparently that of an elderly man, asked if I were Whittaker Chambers. In turn, I asked who he was. "Nobody. It doesn't matter," said the voice. "But I know that your telephone will be ringing every minute now and I had to reach you first. I had to say: 'God bless you! God bless you! Oh, God bless you!' He hung up." (Witness, 1952, Regnery Gateway.)

More Clinton:

Another good article:

from the Washington Weekly:

BILL CLINTON'S ALGER HISS PROBLEM
Bombshell Report Cites Suppressed Evidence of Communist Plot

By Carl Limbacher

OYSTER BAY--Fifty years ago, a young California Congressman
became the first to take the allegations of Whittaker Chambers
seriously. Chambers had alleged that top State Department aide
Alger Hiss was a Soviet spy. Hiss's ensuing trial and conviction
on perjury charges laid bare one of the great American political
scandals of this century: The Communists had infiltrated the
highest levels of our government and were secretly working to
subvert it.

The revelations permanently tarnished Franklin Roosevelt's
legacy. To this day, many New Dealers refuse to accept the
notion that the president who had led the country through
Depression and World War could have been so easily duped by the
man FDR referred to as "Uncle Joe" Stalin. But the deals
Roosevelt cut with Stalin were followed inevitably by the descent
of an Iron Curtain across Eastern Europe. In a legendary photo
of the Yalta meeting between FDR, Stalin in Churchill, Alger Hiss
can be seen hovering in the background. In what may turn out to
be one of the great historical ironies of all time, the young
California congressman who used Whittaker Chambers to expose Hiss
was Richard Nixon, the future 37th president of the United
States. Ironic because fifty years later history may be
repeating itself for President Clinton, who, because of his own
"Alger Hiss" problem, may face the same fate Nixon ultimately
did.

Now it's clear that the taint of Communist infiltration
haunts the Clinton administration. Yes, it has thus far
weathered a year's worth of media reports on its campaign finance
scandal. And four months of Sen. Fred Thompson's investigation
into same had seemed to fall short of the mark. But it was
Thompson himself, the press often reminds us, who set the bar too
high. It had seemed as if the Tennessee Senator had over-reached
at the outset, when he charged that clear and compelling evidence
existed of a Chinese Communist plot to influence American
elections. By the end of October, Thompson cut bait, explaining
that, while he still believed his charge was accurate, the FBI
intelligence data that could have proved it necessarily remained
secret.

But just days ago, Fred Thompson was vindicated. In fact, if
anything, the story that ran on the front page of Friday's
Washington Post makes Thompson's claim seem positively
understated. The evidence uncovered by former Watergate sleuth
Bob Woodward, in a story headlined "FBI Had Overlooked Key Files
in Probe of Chinese Influence," suggests more than a mere attempt
by the Chinese to buy access. That evidence suggests that Bill
Clinton is embroiled in an espionage scandal the likes of which
haven't been seen since the days of Hiss and Chambers.

What else can one make of Woodward passages like this:

The belatedly discovered files indicate that Maria Hsia - a
Taiwanese American immigrant who for a decade has raised
money for Democratic causes - was "doing the bidding" of
Beijing as a Chinese agent, a senior official said.

As Woodward noted, Hsia has connections going back to 1988
with Clinton crony James Riady. Riady's Lippo Group has become
in recent years pretty much a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Chinese government. Maria Hsia worked closely with John Huang,
who's suspicious DNC fund- raising first raised eyebrows a year
ago. Hsia was co-chair with Huang of the April 1996 Buddhist
Temple fundraiser where $140,000 in foreign money was laundered
on its way to help with Clinton's re-election.

Speaking of Mr. Huang, another Woodward tidbit seems to put
him firmly in the Alger Hiss territory:

(FBI Director) Freeh's order turned up other previously
undisclosed leads from FBI files, including reports
considered reliable but unconfirmed that Huang, while serving
as a senior Commerce Department official in the Clinton
administration, passed a classified document to the Chinese
government.

That one classified document passed by Huang is surely the
tip of the Chinese Communist spy-berg - given the record brought
out at the Thompson hearings. While at Commerce Huang received
top secret clearance (without routine FBI background checks) and
sat in on numerous briefings covering classified material. Paula
Greene, a secretary with the Lippo connected Stephen's Investment
firm, recalled that Huang would sneak out from his office at
Commerce and go across the street to Stephens' Washington office,
where he would collect faxes and packages from his old Lippo
bosses. Ms. Greene would notify Huang whenever Lippo material
would arrive for him, but was instructed to do so in strict
secrecy. Telephone records indicate that Huang himself initiated
regular contact with Lippo throughout his Commerce Department
stint. Huang had numerous opportunities to get U.S. secrets to
the Chinese through that conduit alone. During a Sept. 13, 1995
White House meeting with James Riady, Lippo lawyer Joseph Giroir
and consigliere Bruce Lindsey, Bill Clinton personally approved
John Huang's transfer to a key DNC post.

For those who still believe, as many did for years with Alger
Hiss, that Huang and Hsia's behavior was somehow unrelated to
plans hatched in Communist capitals, Woodward's concluding
paragraph contains some bad news:

After Thompson announced two weeks ago that he was suspending
his public hearings, officials said, the FBI obtained
intelligence showing that the Ministry of State Security in
Beijing - the Chinese equivalent of the CIA - boasted it had
been successful in "thwarting" the congressional inquiry.

So much for Chinese strongman Jiang Zemin's denials of just
two weeks ago, which he offered personally while looking Clinton
right in the eye, that there was no Chinese plot. Of course,
what significance is such a denial of conspiracy - as offered
from one conspirator to another? That may be a heady charge.
But look at the evidence staring Americans foresquare in the
face.

On February 2, 1996, the BATF issued special importation
permits for 100,000 Chinese assault rifles and millions of rounds
of ammunition. The guns were unmodified and therefore illegal as
per Bill Clinton's own assault weapons ban. Then why did our
government wave them in at a time when there was no legal US
market for such weaponry? Here's a clue: On February 6, 1996,
just four days after those permits were signed, Bill Clinton
feted Chinese arms dealer Wang Jun inside the White House. Wang
had been brought to the White House by Clinton funny-money man
Charlie Trie, whose invitation had been greased by investment
banker Ernest Green's $50,000 contribution.

This incident was separate and distinct from the 4,000 AK47's
that Wang Jun's Polytechnologies had attempted to smuggle to
Oakland street gangs using Chinese government ships. In fact,
within a month of Wang's White House visit that smuggling
operation was busted; a development that scuttled the much larger
100,000 gun Polytechnologies deal. But the fact remains, not
only did Mr. Clinton play host to a Communist princeling who was
then running a massive US smuggling operation, he was apparently
willing to grant Wang special dispensation from gun control laws
that Clinton himself fought hard to pass.

Curiously, the illegal Wang Jun/Clinton administration gun
deal was reported only by Michael Hedges of Scripps Howard News.
Hedges' story ran on the front page of the March 14, 1997
Arkansas Democrat Gazette - above the fold. But apparently
neither The Washington Post nor The New York Times noticed. In
fact, this development went unreported by every national news
outlet in America.

Need more evidence that Bill Clinton was willing to put
America in harm's way for the price of his own re-election? Try
renowned New York Times columnist A. M. Rosenthal - who just last
month explored "Clinton's Nuclear Deception." Rosenthal began
thusly:

Craftily, ever so craftily, President Clinton is deceiving
the American public about a critical danger to world
security: China's international sales of materiel and
technology of nuclear warfare.....No previous President, and
not even Mr. Clinton himself until now, would take the step
required to permit Chinese nuclear shopping in America -
certifying that China was not illicitly peddling its own
nuclear goods abroad. The U.S. knew that was not true.

Rosenthal concludes:

President Clinton is crafty, but not crafty enough. He has
turned China's broken pledges into a guilt of his own -
deception about a matter of life and death, many lives and
perhaps some hideous day, many deaths.

It's hard to see how importation permits for a Chinese
government gun runner and nuclear technology for the Butchers of
Beijing are in America's interest. And the only aspect that
explains how any of this is in Bill Clinton's interest is the
Chinese campaign cash, raised by foreign agents like John Huang
and Maria Hsia, that bought him his re-election.

No wonder the Chinese CIA is happy. Somewhere, no doubt, the
recently deceased Alger Hiss is smiling. But for the rest, who
may find all this less amusing, I suggest a visit to Georgia
Congressman Bob Barr's website ( http://www.house.gov/barr ),
where support for Barr's resolution for an impeachment inquiry
can be registered via e-mail.

Published in the Nov. 17, 1997 issue of The Washington Weekly
Copyright 1997 The Washington Weekly (http://www.federal.com)
Reposting permitted with this message intact