Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/16/2004 10:00:07 PM PDT by Cracker72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: HenryLeeII; martin_fierro; Redcoat LI
I was mulling it over this morning, and when life gives you lemons, make lemonade, that's what I always say.
 
I've decided that if the Mass Supremes believe the intent of their Constitution was to promote gay marriage and that it must be sanctioned as a human rights issue, then Polygamy is golden too.
 
I've decided to head on up there and marry my wife's sister.  I mean, she looks a lot like my wife, she could use a husband, I'd like to have some more kids, why not?
 
Anyone have any ideas on how to broach this subject with the wife? (I have a history of approaching this type of thing, uh... indelicately.)
Owl_Eagle

”Guns Before Butter.”

61 posted on 05/17/2004 7:03:00 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel (Rice Ashcroft in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

Gay couples begin marrying in Massachusetts

08:49 AM CDT on Monday, May 17, 2004

Associated Press

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. - Gay couples began exchanging vows here Monday, marking the first time a state has granted gays and lesbians the right to marry and making the United States one of four countries where homosexuals can legally wed.

Tanya McCloskey, 52 and Marcia Kadish, 56, of Malden, went at a breakneck pace to fill out paperwork, get a waiver from the usual three-day waiting period, then return to city hall -- where they got their marriage license and exchanged vows.

At 9:15 a.m., Cambridge City Clerk Margaret Drury told the couple: "I now pronounce you married under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts."

It was among the first -- if not the first -- same-sex weddings anticipated to take place throughout the state on Monday, the day that under a court order same-sex couples could wed.

"It was really important to us to just be married. We want to be married as soon as we possibly can. Part of it is, we don't know what the Legislature is going to do," McCloskey said.

At the stroke of midnight, Cambridge officials threw open its doors to couples wishing to fill out marriage license applications. Within hours, judges began issuing waivers to the usual three-day waiting period.

Among those with wedding plans were the seven couples who brought the lawsuit that eventually led the state's highest court to declare gay marriage legal, breaking a barrier many never believed would fall and putting the United States among four countries where gays can marry.

The moves came against the backdrop of scattered protests but a largely festive party atmosphere.

"I'm proud of this state," said John Meuneir, 43, of Boston, who arrived at City Hall in Boston with his partner, Jim Flanagan, 42, more than two hours before the scheduled 8 a.m opening.

In Cambridge, more than 260 couples filled out application forms for marriage licenses in the wee hours. A throng that police estimated was more than 5,000 people converged on city hall, including some heterosexuals there to witness history in the making.

Massachusetts was thrust into the center of a nationwide debate on gay marriage when the state's Supreme Judicial Court issued its narrow 4-3 ruling in November that gays and lesbians had a right under the state constitution to wed.

In the days leading up to Monday's deadline for same-sex weddings to begin, opponents looked to the federal courts for help in overturning the Supreme Judicial Court's ruling. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to intervene.

The SJC's ruling touched off a frenzy of gay-marriages across the country earlier this year, emboldening officials in San Francisco, upstate New York, and Portland, Ore., to issue marriage licenses as acts of civil disobedience. Even though courts ordered a halt to the wedding march, opponents pushed for a federal constitutional ban on gay marriage, which President Bush has endorsed.

The SJC's ruling also galvanized opponents of gay marriage in Massachusetts, prompting lawmakers in this heavily Democratic, Roman Catholic state to adopt a state constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage but legalize Vermont-style civil unions. The earliest it could wind up on the ballot is 2006 -- possibly casting a shadow on the legality of perhaps thousands of gay marriages that take place in the intervening years.

Massachusetts joins the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada's three most populous provinces as the only places in the world where gays can marry. The rest of Canada is expected to follow soon.

The city of Cambridge, a liberal bastion that is home to Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, opened its doors to couples at midnight, and remained open until about 4:30 a.m. to accommodate the people who flocked there to make history.

The first couple to receive marriage paperwork was Marcia Hams, 56, and her partner, Susan Shepherd, 52, of Cambridge. After 27 years together, they sat at a table across from a city official shortly after midnight, filling out forms as their adult son looked on.

"I feel really overwhelmed," Hams said as they left the clerk's office and walked through a throng of reporters. "I could collapse at this point."

About 15 protesters, most from Topeka, Kan.-based Westboro Baptist Church, stood near City Hall carrying signs. The group, led by the Rev. Fred Phelps Sr., travels around the country protesting homosexuality.

Out-of-state gay couples are likely to challenge Massachusetts' 1913 marriage statute, which bars out-of-state couples from marrying in Massachusetts if the union would be illegal in their home state. Gov. Mitt Romney, a gay-marriage opponent, has said the law will be enforced and clerks who give licenses to nonresidents may face legal implications.

Still, local officials in Provincetown, Worcester and Somerville, have said they will not enforce Romney's order and will give licenses to any couples who ask, as long as they sign the customary affidavit attesting that they know of no impediment to their marriage.

Sure enough, Chris McCary, 43, and his partner of six years, John Sullivan, 37, of Anniston, Ala., were first in line outside town hall in Provincetown on Monday morning.

"This is the most important day of my life," said McCary.

Both sides in the debate say the issue may figure prominently in the November elections across the country.

Candidates for Congress could face pressure to explain their position on a proposed federal constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage, and voters in several states will consider similar amendments to their state constitutions.

Married couples are entitled to hundreds of right and protections under Massachusetts law, including the ability to file joint state tax returns, automatic preference for making medical decisions for a disabled spouse and workers' compensation benefits. But other rights, such as the ability to jointly file a federal tax return, are not available because federal law defines marriage as between a man and a woman.


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/051704dnnatgay.280a.html

68 posted on 05/17/2004 7:12:08 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (There is ONLY ONE good Democrat: one that has just been voted OUT of POWER ! Straight ticket GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

"My Big Fat Greek Wedding"


97 posted on 05/17/2004 10:28:43 AM PDT by biblewonk (No man can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

"Massachusetts joins the Netherlands, Belgium and Canada's three most populous provinces as the only places in the world where gays can marry."

Glad we're in such good company.


99 posted on 05/17/2004 10:39:03 AM PDT by SirAllen (Liberalism^2 = Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

USA, a nation in decline....

We will reap what we sow....that's a promise.


106 posted on 05/17/2004 10:56:21 AM PDT by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

Gentlemen, the time has come for action. We've got to corner the KY market in Massachusetts!


108 posted on 05/17/2004 11:28:24 AM PDT by FormerLib (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

You all should relax -- the waters are just being testing in Massachusetts and they will find the water rather cold. Give our citizens some credit -- gay marriage will never stand in this nation.


128 posted on 05/17/2004 5:09:55 PM PDT by oneoftheothers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72
Has anybody ever thought that maybe, just maybe this is all about money? Taxxachusetts could give a rats ass about the so called "rights" of faggots and lesbos. What they DO care about is the revenue that it will generate for the state.

First they rake in the dough by issuing licenses, secondly they will rake in the dough when these oh so in love degenerates decide that it's "just not working out" and file for divorce.

I'm in no way in favor of this crap but I say let them be duped into it. They deserve it.


129 posted on 05/17/2004 6:24:20 PM PDT by unixfox (Close the borders, problems solved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

Jehovah God to America; my scales have just been calibrated and guess what? You have been weighed and found wanting! Turn out the lights the party is over! You were warned now you pay! The shaddow of HIS Glory is fleeting from our shores!


130 posted on 05/17/2004 6:43:07 PM PDT by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

Also in the news, the state of Massachusetts has begun issuing licenses for pigs to fly sans aircraft.

They are working on licenses for making silk purses out of sows' ears as we speak.


153 posted on 05/19/2004 9:43:57 AM PDT by FormerLib (It's the 99% of Mohammedans that make the other 1% look bad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Cracker72

And to think, people thought a Constitutional Amendment wasn't necessary. These liberal judges think they're accountable to no one. There's something that's been forgotten: impeaching the foreign-born judge who put this mess in motion.


155 posted on 05/19/2004 3:56:24 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson