Replies

The fact that her post was so obviously zotworthy by most of those who read it (and a slippery anti-Bush post at that), indicates that you're the one from Rio Linda. I'll stake my credibility on this forum against yours any day of the week.

You said:

There is nothing in her post that leads one to believe anything other than she wante to vent a complaint on a valid topic.

Many folks on this forum found plenty in her post to suspect her motives. In fact, some of us found her post to be so obviously insincere that an inability to recognize that seemed incredible. But these opinions aren't valid to you because they don't match your opinions. No, for disagreeing with you about the purpose of her post, we are compared with jackasses and our reactions are compared to those of nazis.

You also continue to complain about people pointing out her spelling mistakes. She's looking for a job...in education...her spelling is extraordinarily relevant. Since you're looking for work as well, your spelling is equally relevant. That's not a personal attack, that's an effort to point out that a skills-update might be in order. Bad spelling is not Bush's fault, nor is it the fault of outsourcing, by the way.

On the other hand, you castigate me about poor debate skills, yet it seems those who don't agree with you are always asses or jackasses? Why is that? Why do you react with such severe resentment to anyone who has the temerity to disagree with you?

'Tammy' posted that "I have sent my resume and a cover letter to bush three times and have gotten no response." What should Bush's response be? Why is it his duty to find her a job?

And why do you keep asking for proof that her post is not genuine? Are we not free to read her post and make our own judgment about her sincerity, even if that judgment disagrees with yours?

In short, what does the world owe you, and how much time do we have to arrange to provide your due?

On the other hand, you castigate me about poor debate skills, yet it seems those who don't agree with you are always asses or jackasses?

Yep, I disagree with your debate skills, not that the skills themselves are poor - you're quite skilled at debate. It's your tactics that are wanting. When you so obviously misconstrue what someone says, then I chastise that. And with every right to do so as a matter of self defense - as though it were neeeded. Everyone present can read for themselves and see what you're doing, so why you think you're getting by with something is beyond me. And for that, I would say you are acting like a jackass. But I don't go to the extent of labeling everyone that way who disagrees with me. Just the ones that act as you do in lying willfully about what I've said in the first place. The ones who just honestly disagree don't seem to feel the need to lie about me in the doing. I've no problem with that.

I personally believe Homosexuality is a sin and a morally bankrupt lifestyle if not sleazy and sickening. People disagree with me. That doesn't make them vile, they just don't have the same spiritual or moral grounding I have. And that is where debate comes in. One side or the other may never win; but, at least one can hope the two sides can come to understand the other and still be as respectful as possible. I may not respect other people's beliefs; but, I respect their right to hold them and I respect them as human beings. And if my ideas are correct to begin with, they stand on their own. When one has to employ deciet, lies, and the like, one knows at the outset that their ideas are wanting or they wouldn't need to lie in there presentation - that's debate 101 and common sense 101.

Advertising something as a real fake doesn't sell; but, if you say it's real "faux", they are more likely to buy into it not understanding the word. That's a more obvious form of deciet that is easily conquered by knowledge. Just as with some of your relentless twistings. I have to guess about your motivations.. but, the motivation for lying and deciet in attacking someone is usually a matter of weakness. So, I'm not sure what your ultimate point is. If your argument or stance is so week you have to resort to that behavior, I'm not significantly moved by your handwringing about my pointing it out to others. I would be moved if you straightened up and stopped acting deceitfully so that we could talk like grown ups. You're the only one not allowing that to happen.