I hate to say this but there just has to be something wrong with the way the Schindler's lawyers are operating.
I hate to say it, too, but I think it. And, I don't understand why Michael's comments to media have been ignored by the courts - those of "punishing" the parents for whatever it is he seems to think they did to him in the beginning. I heard him, myself. He's being childishly vindictive.
Right on Saundra Duffy!
Incompetence Royale!
Attorney friends who have reviewed this case are irate! A woman's life is at stake!
The Schindlers' attourneys have in the past made some serious mistakes, probably in large measure as a result of failing to understand what sort of people Michael and Felos were. That having been said, there are clear signs of unjustifiable judicial bias against them. Unfortunately, the question of whether a particular judge should be recused from a case is left up to that judge himself; if a judge says he can try a case impartially, the system is generally bound to believe him.
Indeed, from what I understand, the Schindlers did once manage to get a case tried before a fact-finding judge other than Judge Greer. That other judge found in the Schindler's favor. Unfortunately, the appellate court ruled that the case should have gone before Judge Greer and remanded the case to his courtroom (where, of course, it was decided against the parents).