Well, this should be interesting..
1 posted on
05/10/2004 7:33:04 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: AntiGuv
What is the point of ANYONE reporting this? Is this kind of news really NEWS? Is reporting this necessary? Excluding the "forced masterbation", is sex between soldiers a criminal act? (I am really asking this question, as I don't know if military law addresses this.) It may be disgusting, but is it something we all need to know about or (worse) see???
28 posted on
05/10/2004 7:38:49 PM PDT by
I'm ALL Right!
(I'll only vote for a candidate who is comforable with JEANS, a COWBOY HAT and a RIFLE!)
To: AntiGuv
Wonder whether it was hetero, lesbo or homo, or a combination of the above?
29 posted on
05/10/2004 7:39:27 PM PDT by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo Arabiam Esse Delendam -- Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit)
To: AntiGuv
Now what!!!
![](http://www.bonkers-online.com/clips/darkwing.gif)
32 posted on
05/10/2004 7:40:46 PM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: AntiGuv
Hah! No wonder the Senators want their own copies. Perverts!
34 posted on
05/10/2004 7:41:05 PM PDT by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: AntiGuv
Making POWs wear women's underwear is disgusting enough, but forcing them to watch videos of American soldiers having sex with each other is beyond human capacity for cruelty.
37 posted on
05/10/2004 7:41:25 PM PDT by
bayourod
(Was Kerry one of the 17 Congressmen to whom Lawson sent torture pictures in March?)
To: AntiGuv
If it is gay sex thank don't ask - don't tell. If it was straight sex thank Aspen's expansion of women's roles. Either way the American people have to blame Clinton for what he did to our military.
To: AntiGuv
Hardly worth the disc space.
To: AntiGuv
This is absolutely ludicrous. We are now discussing releasing to the public pornography.
46 posted on
05/10/2004 7:43:01 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: AntiGuv
![](http://biger.kiev.ua/img/shocked.jpg)
My God! Sex!? With each other?! Oh no!
47 posted on
05/10/2004 7:43:12 PM PDT by
Lunatic Fringe
(John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
To: Southack
Well, you called it.
49 posted on
05/10/2004 7:43:36 PM PDT by
onyx
(Rummy's job is winning the war, not micro-managing some damn prison.)
To: AntiGuv; All
OMGGG this getting worst for US miltary
F*****
51 posted on
05/10/2004 7:44:26 PM PDT by
SevenofNine
("Not everybody , in it, for truth, justice, and the American way,"=Det Lennie Briscoe)
To: AntiGuv
Besides the fact that gender integration was forced on the military by likes of Patsy Schroeder, men and women in uniform have been having sex for as long as women have served. The news here is that they are now stupid enough to video and photograph their trysts. Two reasons: 1) clinton set the example and the top brass hasn't help; 2) cheap video and digital cameras have are prevalent everywhere.
Exclude women from combat units and minimize proximity to hormone driven yuts. Simple.
55 posted on
05/10/2004 7:51:33 PM PDT by
A Navy Vet
(Moderate Islam is the Trojan horse; Radical Islam is the carriage)
To: AntiGuv
Considering that Bush and Rummy are responsible for somehow "setting the tone" for the abuse to happen does this fall under the auspices of the "Clinton Military"?
56 posted on
05/10/2004 7:53:45 PM PDT by
Dr Snide
(vis pacem, para bellum - Prepare for war if you want peace)
To: AntiGuv
I was listening to Michael Savage earlier this evening. He was interviewing an author who wrote "Rumsfeld's War." This guest said that, due to the photos release, now captives can no longer be hooded.
Hoods are used to disorient captives. Now, apparently, that technique can no longer be used.
[This war is turning more and more PC and that is not good.]
57 posted on
05/10/2004 7:54:05 PM PDT by
TomGuy
(Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
To: AntiGuv
Only the commander in chief is allowed to have sex with a subordinate. Oral and cigar sex only though. Oh, and it must occur in the oval office.
To: cyncooper; Miss Marple; Dane
which include the forced masturbation of a detainee...It's Hackworth's fault!
To: AntiGuv
Do we really want to see this?
65 posted on
05/10/2004 8:00:54 PM PDT by
RobbyS
To: AntiGuv
If tese photos were shown on a college campus it would be free speech, particularly if the sex were homosexual in nature.
To: AntiGuv
Clinton introduced co-ed basic training and put women in war zones. He also introduced "Don't ask, don't tell," which is evidently a factor in the prisoner abuse.
70 posted on
05/10/2004 8:04:46 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: AntiGuv
I just heard on NBC News that most of the sex videos involve Leash Girl (Lynndie England) and her fiance (currently on trial for abuse.)
If that's the extent of the "sex videos" its not that bad.
Classless, of course, but not too awful.
71 posted on
05/10/2004 8:06:17 PM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson