[A Jovial Cad]

*I guess you missed the hint, that from what I have seen (over a much longer period than just this thread) your analysis was way off*

I guess I did. As a rule, I don't shadow posters I've disagreed with in one thread to the next, looking for openings to challenge them. I treat each thread for what it is: one argument about one issue on one particular day/night. I can't honestly remember ever interacting with an "Diddle E. Squat" at FR in any manner whatsoever, but perhaps I have. Challenging me to debate often leads to such resentment on the part of the challenger after the dust settles, so I understand.
That said, please enlighten me on how my "analysis" is "way off"? Pray tell, what about it is skewed, wrong, horrific, & subversive of everything fitfully right in "Diddle E. Squat's" world? By all means proceed.

[Diddle E. Squat]

As a rule, I don't shadow posters I've disagreed with in one thread to the next, looking for openings to challenge them.

Well that's nice, but your analysis appears once again to be way off, if you are implying that is what I have done. Here's another hint, that should now make it pretty obvious: You are not the poster I am familiar with.