Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Soldier's Family Set in Motion Chain of Events on Disclosure [Hackworth involved in CBS photos]
NY Times ^ | 5/8/04 | James Dao and Eric Lichtblau

Posted on 05/07/2004 11:02:41 PM PDT by saquin

CUMBERLAND, Md., May 7 — Ivan Frederick was distraught. His son, an Army reservist turned prison guard in Iraq, was under investigation earlier this year for mistreating prisoners, and photographs of the abuse were beginning to circulate among soldiers and military investigators.

So the father went to his brother-in-law, William Lawson, who was afraid that reservists like his nephew would end up taking the fall for what he considered command lapses, Mr. Lawson recounted in an interview on Friday. He knew whom to turn to: David Hackworth, a retired colonel and a muckraker who was always willing to take on the military establishment. Mr. Lawson sent an e-mail message in March to Mr. Hackworth's Web site and got a call back from an associate there in minutes, he said.

That e-mail message would put Mr. Lawson in touch with the CBS News program "60 Minutes II" and help set in motion events that led to the public disclosure of the graphic photographs and an international crisis for the Bush administration.

It is still not entirely clear who leaked the photos and how they got into the hands of a "60 Minutes II" producer. What is clear, however, is that the furor over the photos is unlikely to dissipate any time soon.

And it may only get worse.

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld disclosed Friday that there were "many more photos" and videos of abuse that have not yet become public. And he acknowledged in Senate testimony that the military might have mishandled the affair by not alerting members of Congress and the public to the growing seriousness of the military's investigation into the abuses before the images became public on "60 Minutes II."

"I wish I had been able to convey to them the gravity of this before we saw it in the media," Mr. Rumsfeld said.

The irony, Mr. Lawson said, is that the public spectacle might have been avoided if the military and the federal government had been responsive to his claims that his nephew was simply following orders. Mr. Lawson said he sent letters to 17 members of Congress about the case earlier this year, with virtually no response, and that he ultimately contacted Mr. Hackworth's Web site out of frustration, leading him to cooperate with a consultant for "60 Minutes II."

"The Army had the opportunity for this not to come out, not to be on 60 Minutes," he said. "But the Army decided to prosecute those six G.I.'s because they thought me and my family were a bunch of poor, dirt people who could not do anything about it. But unfortunately, that was not the case."

Many of the incriminating photographs appear to have been taken on a digital camera by a soldier in the 372nd Military Police Company who is now facing a court-martial. From there, they appear to have circulated among military personnel in Iraq via e-mail and computer disks, and some may have found their way to family members in the United States.

But there are still numerous unresolved questions about the photographs. One is why they were taken. Some officials suggest that soldiers wanted the photographs as souvenirs, but some relatives said they believed that the photographs were going to be shown to other prisoners to pressure their cooperation.

Then there is the question of how the photographs became public.

Lt. Gen. Lance Smith, deputy commander of forces in the region, testifying Friday before Congress, said he was still unclear how that happened. "It was a surprise that it got out," General Smith said.

Military officials were aware of two disks with photographs on them that were part of continuing investigations, one in Iraq and another in Washington, he said.

"That was the limit of the pictures, and we thought we had them all," General Smith said.

Producers at "60 Minutes II" are not saying exactly how they got the photographs. But Jeff Fager, the executive producer, said, "We heard about someone who was outraged about it and thought that the public should know about it."

Digital cameras have become so ubiquitous in the military that many relatives of personnel in the 372nd and other units in Iraq said they routinely received photographs by e-mail. But the photographs were usually tourist-type photographs of smiling sons and daughters, relatives said.

Officials said that the photographs showing psychological or physical abuse numbered in the hundreds, perhaps more than 1,000, with Mr. Rumsfeld hinting Friday that more may come out.

Among some prison personnel in Iraq, the photographs were apparently an open secret. "Some soldiers in Iraq had them — I'm hearing that soldiers were showing them to everybody," Mr. Lawson said. He said he did not have the original photos and did not turn them over to anyone.

The photographs have now turned soldiers like Mr. Lawson's nephew, Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick, and Pfc. Lynndie R. England into graphic symbols of military abuse. But for Mr. Lawson, they are evidence of a complete breakdown in training and authority in the Iraqi prison system.

He shared his frustration in his March 23 e-mail message to Mr. Hackworth's Web site, writing: "We have contacted the Red Cross, Congress both parties, Bill O'Reilly and many others. Nobody wants to touch this."

Less than five weeks later, images of his nephew — interviewed on "60 Minutes II" with Mr. Lawson's help — would be shown around the world. Far from untouchable, the story would become unavoidable.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004electionbias; 60minutes; abugerbil; agitprop; bushhaters; cbs; ccrm; crazyivan; dontaskdonttell; hacknut; hackworth; iraq; iraqaftermath; iraqipow; iraqipowphotos; ivanfrederick; jailhouselawyers; loathesthemilitary; media; mediabias; moralrelativism; prisonabuse; propaganda; saddamites; therestofthestory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 901-903 next last
To: saquin
If the truth were really known, I would bet money that someone with a bird on his shoulder or lettuce on his cap is ultimately responsible. However, I am equally certain that the powers that be, will see to it that it will go no higher than some young, first-year lieutenant and then, only if they can't figure out a way to confine it to the non-coms.

Although it has been quite a few years since I was in the military, I can't imagine it changing so much that such actions would be initiated by anyone below command level. Anyone who shows any signs of individual thought won't make it past boot camp. Their entire training is aimed at excising individual thought and enforcing obedience to orders and they do that job very well. Oh, there may be an occasional soldier who gets through the system, with his individuality still intact, but they are few and far between. The chances that so many would end up in the same place, at the same time is far greater than that of you winning the lottery on your first attempt. There is no doubt in my mind that those soldiers were following orders. I just don't know how far up the ladder it goes.

I don't think that Rumsfeld knew about it or would have condoned it. But I would bet that ultimate responsibility goes high enough up the ladder that when the secret part of the investigation is over and Rumsfeld reads that report, he will recognize the name(s) of the man (or men) who was responsible. That person will probably be quietly forced to retire, but the public will never hear about it and that's all that will happen. That's the way it has always been done. Even when the politicos have no knowledge of the wrongdoing, they want to keep the responsibility as far from themselves as possible, so the scapegoat is almost always a non-com.

In my opinion, Rumsfeld is the only person in the administration, including Dubya, with any real integrity. It would be a shame if Dubya were to fire him, though I have no doubt that he would, if he thought that it would improve his chances of re-election. Even if Rumsfeld were to be fired, the command officer who was ultimately responsible, will probably never be known to the public.

 

741 posted on 05/08/2004 1:58:34 PM PDT by Action-America (Best President: Reagan * Worst President: Klinton * Worst GOP President: Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
Hack is a bitter POS.

Hack wants his buddy Bubba back as CIC. Pardon me while I puke.

742 posted on 05/08/2004 2:03:18 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Great -- now 60 Minutes is going to turn out the hero in this case. Next we'll see a film version about the media's heroism.
743 posted on 05/08/2004 2:06:55 PM PDT by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Please explain in some semblance of reason how presenting photos of these actual events 'endangers every one of those kids' or 'endangered this country'. I really don't understand how 'conservatives' condone this action and heap hatred upon the person delivering the photos. It's not like he committed the crime.

When you show pictures of all the bad things our military has done Iraq and you don't show any of the good things that our military has done in Iraq and you don't show the bad things that have been done to our military in Iraq, then you have not painted an objective picture of what our military is doing in Iraq.

The pictures of this war presented by the media are mostly bad. The work being done by our troops is mostly good.

Please explain in some semblance of reason how the above scenario DOES NOT endanger every one of our troops in Iraq, our objective in Iraq and our country.

744 posted on 05/08/2004 2:07:04 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: subedei
Who cares about the revenge factor. Exactly what will be the difference between those we are fighting now and those who are supposedly going to take revenge? And am I supposed to weep for those who committed actual criminal acts?

If we care about the revenge that has played out against these Iraqi prisoners, then we should care about the revenge factor that may be played out against these six and more importantly all of our troops in Iraq.

The pictures were classified and should not have been leaked.

745 posted on 05/08/2004 2:10:18 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 731 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I really don't understand how 'conservatives' condone this action and heap hatred upon the person delivering the photos.

What's odd is that this is a 100% turnaround from the Manuel Miranda memogate incident, where Democrats wanted his head and FReepers were screaming to look into the content of the stolen memos. Now its Democrats wanting to look into the photos and FReepers calling for the head of the person that released the photos.
746 posted on 05/08/2004 2:12:48 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: saquin
Now CBS' 60 Minutes II decided to put out the photos -- the people's right to know.

When can we expect CBS to publish the substance of the memos from Memogate?

Where was CBS when Juanita was making her allegations and telling her story?

Where was CBS when Chinagate was going down? When Johnnie Chung was looking to explain himself to the world? When Clintoids like the Riady boys are involved, CBS isn't interested? Guess not.
747 posted on 05/08/2004 2:18:21 PM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds
We must protect our troops and our childrens serving in the armed forces right now. There lives depend on us. What CBS and there Demon -rats and other terrorist funded groups like N.O.W. and the other anti-God forces are doing is fueling the fire more and more.

I say it's time to fight beside our troops and do what-ever-it takes to defense them from the attacks
from within......

Time to turn-off CBS and others that are against the U.S.A.
and the right to live. I am sick and tired seeing the 5th Column going un-checked. These are our childrens.

Our troops !!! I say FIGHT !!!!
748 posted on 05/08/2004 2:33:20 PM PDT by Orlando (www.mensnewsdaily.com, www.mensactivism.org (Support Fathers/Veteran Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 747 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Nobody condones it. The acts and those who perpetrated them are beneath contempt and everyone involved in it needs to be brought to justice. Those who released handed out the photos had an agenda and it wasn't anything to do with stopping these actions. They had already been stopped. The people involved were already indicted. A two foot tall investigation had already been put together. What purpose would be served by putting these pictures out in a time of war other than to demoralize our troops, sully our country, and attempt to destroy the progress in Iraq?
749 posted on 05/08/2004 2:33:30 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal
I agree, it still looks like a staged event to me, someone made this happen to either get us out of the ME or get Bush out of office. Either AQ or HC.

Other possibility mentioned above is a gay porn ring. I really hadn't thought of that angle.

750 posted on 05/08/2004 2:36:31 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 739 | View Replies]

To: billbears
It is really not that hard to understand. As we all know, these pictures are even more offensive to the Islamic world than they are to us. However, in the Islamic world, they don't form commitees and organizations to protest. Instead, they take out their anger on whomever happens to be near, like Americans in theater. In addition, the publication of these photos gives Al Qaeda a handy recruiting tool. And perhaps you have missed the story about the Imam who has said that all female soldiers captured by the militia may be used as sex slaves.

There was NO reason to publish these photos, since the Army already had investigations well underway and were revamping the system. People were already in custody. The report listed the offenses.

But that wasn't enough for CBS...they had to show the pictures. And in the process, violated the Geneva Convention and made certain that those prisoners in the pictures were humiliated not just before the prison guards but before the entire Arab world.

There are two wrongs here. The first is that of the guards and officers in the prison. They should get the maximum punishment available.

The second wrong is that of the media, who in the process of getting the pictures out in order to damage Bush, have indeed endangered the troops in Iraq, and in fact have given us a setback in the war on terror.

751 posted on 05/08/2004 2:38:28 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 737 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; billbears
Well stated MM!
But he is a waste of time.
The lurkers will read and see your wisdom!
Thank you.

752 posted on 05/08/2004 2:44:05 PM PDT by onyx (WHO LEAKED TO CBS? Was it you Col. Hackworth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb; nopardons
Or is there a puppet master with his hand up... oh, nevermind. I almost exposed you to grown-up language again.

Abuse report sent, you have gone over the line.
753 posted on 05/08/2004 2:52:45 PM PDT by wasp69 (This tag line for sale because Dave Ramsey said so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I was happy to respond. I fail to see why no one in the media, including Rush, Hannity, Medved, and the rest, are speaking about CBS's culpability in this.

If it is against the Geneva Convention to humiliate prisoners, why is CBS broadcasting the photos. They are, in my opinion, as guilty of war crimes as the guards at the prison.

754 posted on 05/08/2004 2:55:23 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 752 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
why is CBS broadcasting the photos

"The public's right to know", don't you know? (Does that even have to be stated anymore?) Or, to translate it into everyday language - the mob's right and demand to be titillated 24/7!

755 posted on 05/08/2004 3:02:39 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
Those who released handed out the photos had an agenda and it wasn't anything to do with stopping these actions.

From reading the one of the soldier's father's account was that he was afraid his son and 6 other soliders were going to take the entire blame for this and so went to the media.
756 posted on 05/08/2004 3:03:26 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 749 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I agree 100+%, but the Republicans in charge are PUN*S and won't do nothing to defense our troops.

What else is left ???

757 posted on 05/08/2004 3:05:36 PM PDT by Orlando (www.mensnewsdaily.com, www.mensactivism.org (Support Fathers/Veteran Rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
If it is against the Geneva Convention to humiliate prisoners, why is CBS broadcasting the photos. They are, in my opinion, as guilty of war crimes as the guards at the prison.

What kind of twisted logic is that? You witness acts, take photos to publicize the inhuman treatment and you're the one being called the war criminal?
758 posted on 05/08/2004 3:10:25 PM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 754 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Well duh! They're the ones in the pictures. The rest of the investigation tracing this up the line in already in progress.

No, that excuse won't wash. Any REPUTABLE news agency would have checked that out before airing the photos.

759 posted on 05/08/2004 3:12:05 PM PDT by McGavin999 (If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 756 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Instead, they take out their anger on whomever happens to be near, like Americans in theater.

Hmmmm, seems like they were doing that already. Or did you miss the reports on the hundreds of brave soldiers that have died since we 'won'? This changes nothing. Islamonuts hate the occupation force no matter what would have been done.

There was NO reason to publish these photos, since the Army already had investigations well underway and were revamping the system. People were already in custody. The report listed the offenses.

In our history, the stories that don't make the media and get to the public tend to be covered over

And in the process, violated the Geneva Convention and made certain that those prisoners in the pictures were humiliated not just before the prison guards but before the entire Arab world.

As if the soldiers didn't violate the Geneva convention in doing it in the first place. Have you even read part II or part III of section I? Practically everything it said not to do, these men and women did. Frankly, I think it's a good thing they're out in the open. Gives the citizens of the respective states a little taste of what these young people have been ingrained from the television media and entertainment divisions of our society.

Of course one couldn't expect anything further reaching to come out of this, say perhaps a responsibility factor on our society for breeding such 'free thinkers' but heck let's blame CBS for throwing it in our face shall we?

The second wrong is that of the media, who in the process of getting the pictures out in order to damage Bush, have indeed endangered the troops in Iraq, and in fact have given us a setback in the war on terror

And this is where you've lost me. Reporting what the youth of this society are doing over there does not threaten them in anyway. Islamics weren't going to love us under any circumstance. Or perhaps you missed the 'popular' US backed newspaper shutting down the other day when the entire staff walked off because of censorship. I want to know this is happening. And from many of the polls out there, the majority of the citizens of the respective states want to know it as well. Frankly, I've already sensed a change in some of the people I work with who served in Desert Storm I compared to older veterans I know

What amazes me is the double standard. Instead of getting upset, 'conservatives' cheer Rummy for standing up in the face of Congressional questioning. I know the era is long gone of expecting our Armed Forces to act a cut above the enemy. Even if they didn't follow the Geneva Convention, our Armed Forces expected themselves to do so. But on this thread, there is cheering when the Armed Forces do stoop to the level of the Islamics. That and lambasting a news organization for telling us they did so with photographs. I don't know what concerns me more. The fact that I see praise for those that would debase a man because they did it to us first or that we shouldn't be told what those who are 'spreading democracy' are doing to accomplish this job.

The rambling WOST continues..

760 posted on 05/08/2004 3:12:40 PM PDT by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 751 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740741-760761-780 ... 901-903 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson