Skip to comments.
Baby boomers fuel jump in pot use
Salt Lake Tribune ^
| 5/5/04
| Lindsey Tanner
Posted on 05/05/2004 2:30:07 PM PDT by qam1
CHICAGO -- Habitual marijuana use increased among U.S. adults over the past decade, particularly among young minorities and baby boomers, government figures show.
The prevalence of marijuana abuse or dependence climbed from 1.2 percent of adults in 1991-92 to 1.5 percent in 2001-02, or an estimated 3 million adults 18 and over.
That represents an increase of 800,000 people, according to data from two nationally representative surveys that each queried more than 40,000 adults.
Among 18- to 29-year-olds, the rate of abuse or dependence remained stable among whites but surged by about 220 percent among black men and women, to 4.5 percent of that population, and by almost 150 percent among Latino men, to 4.7 percent.
Among all adults ages 45 to 64, the rate increased by 355 percent, to about 0.4 percent of that population. The report, published in today's Journal of the American Medical Association, was led by Wilson Compton of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, who said the rise in dependence was probably due at least partly to increases in the potency of pot over the past decade.
Also, the figures may indicate that baby boomers "bring their bad habits with them into old age," he said. The researchers said adults were considered marijuana abusers if repeated use of the drug hurt their ability to function at work, in school or in social situations, or created drug-related legal problems.
Drug users were considered dependent if they experienced increased tolerance of marijuana, used it compulsively and continued using it despite drug-related physical or psychological problems.
Overall use of the drug -- that is, casual use and habitual use -- remained stable at around 4 percent of adults.
"This study suggests that we need to develop ways to monitor the continued rise in marijuana abuse and dependence and strengthen existing prevention and intervention efforts," said Nora Volkow, the institute's director. Programs that target young black and Latino adults are particularly needed, she said.
Increases in dependence among young minorities may reflect their growing assimilation into sectors of white society where marijuana use is more accepted, Compton said.
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism contributed to the report.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; genxpunks; growupalready; junkies; libertarians; likewowman; losertarians; ondcpagentpaulsen; pot; potheads; tattooedlosers; tertiarydoesmeth; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-178 next last
To: The kings dead
"So why is marijuana not acceptable so long as you don't get stoned while in public to get people hurt or at home while caring for kids?"Geez MrLeRoy, if dopers are not in public with marijuana, or if they are indeed at home caring for kids, how is it that 630,000 USERS ARE GETTING ARRESTED EACH YEAR?
To: The kings dead
If one drinks to get drunk, one is abusing alcohol. Can we stay on topic?
To: robertpaulsen
so long as you don't get stoned while in public if dopers are not in public with marijuana
Can we stay on topic?
83
posted on
05/06/2004 8:20:47 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: stands2reason
Here in New York State all of the growers that I know are white, either mid 20s or mid 50s. All of the people who import "BC Bud" from Canada are also white, and of similar age ranges.
Maybe it is a georgraphical difference.
84
posted on
05/06/2004 8:21:09 AM PDT
by
bc2
("Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown" - harpseal)
To: robertpaulsen
If one drinks to get drunk, one is abusing alcohol.And if one drinks to get mentally altered but less than drunk?
Can we stay on topic?
Hey, you brought up this proposed definition of "abuse;" I'm just checking if you really believe it.
85
posted on
05/06/2004 8:23:13 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: The kings dead
Oh no. You were even more specific than that. It was, I believe, "so long as you don't get stoned while in public to get people hurt".
Remember, be as specific as you can so you always have an "out". Heaven forbid you would actually add to the discussion.
To: The kings dead
"And if one drinks to get mentally altered but less than drunk?"And if this ... and if that ... but if this ... but if that.
I'm getting tired of your silly game of 20 questions. You got something to say, say it. Then I'll comment if I feel like it.
Go away, troll.
To: robertpaulsen
You were even more specific than that. It was, I believe, "so long as you don't get stoned while in public to get people hurt".Remember, be as specific as you can so you always have an "out".
That was A CA Guy's specification; kick him around if you like.
88
posted on
05/06/2004 8:32:18 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: qam1
CHICAGO -- Habitual marijuana use increased among U.S. adults over the past decade, particularly among young minorities and baby boomers, government figures show. I seriously doubt their ability to measure this.
89
posted on
05/06/2004 8:34:30 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(No man can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them.)
To: The kings dead
He was referring to a legal product. You copy someone else's phrase, you take responsibility for it.
To: boxsmith13
Baby Boomers are the worst generation everHow so?
sniff sniff...............
To: robertpaulsen
And if one drinks to get mentally altered but less than drunk?You got something to say, say it.
Since you're carefully avoiding saying much, OK. I don't think you believe your proposed definition of "abuse," nor do I think those who deal professionally with substance abuse would accept it; I don't think you or those professionals would agree that one who drank to "unwind" was abusing alcohol.
92
posted on
05/06/2004 8:41:02 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: robertpaulsen
He was referring to a legal product.Relevance?
You copy someone else's phrase, you take responsibility for it.
But that certainly doesn't let the originator off the hook.
93
posted on
05/06/2004 8:43:40 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: The kings dead
Is that what you think about what I think or professionals think?
Well, I think you're entitled to your opinion, since that's all you'll offer.
To: The kings dead
Relevance?Turn this into a statement, then I'll consider addressing it.
To: robertpaulsen
We'll never know what you think if you keep squirming to evade my questions.
96
posted on
05/06/2004 8:53:50 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: robertpaulsen
The fact that A CA Guy was referring to a legal product is of no clear relevance to my question to him.
97
posted on
05/06/2004 8:55:01 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: robertpaulsen
I think you're entitled to your opinion, since that's all you'll offer.You've offered nothing other than your opinion in support of your definition of "abuse."
98
posted on
05/06/2004 8:56:53 AM PDT
by
The kings dead
(O.C.-Old Cracker:"It's time for some of our freedoms to get curtailed for the sake of the Republic.")
To: qam1
Before I buy into this theory, I'd like to see a study, demographically, if there is a corresponding increase in the sales of Doretos and Oreos..................
99
posted on
05/06/2004 8:58:03 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...)
To: qam1
What is this? The liberal media engaging in PROFILING?
100
posted on
05/06/2004 9:00:24 AM PDT
by
FrankR
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161-178 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson