[Blood of Tyrants]

And you REALLY believe that the outcome wasn't determined before the trial ever began? Here is a clue: THE JUDGE WORKS FOR THE GOVERNMENT!

[Central Scrutiniser]

Hey Blood, maybe you should put more of your responses in bold, that way the strident nuttiness stands out more.

[ancient_geezer]

Here is a clue: THE JUDGE WORKS FOR THE GOVERNMENT!

So? Any protestation that taxes do not apply to you is then nonsense:

• For working for the government that judge will be certain to make the tax law applies to you regardless;
• And in the instance the law does indeed apply to you and is constitutional, the judges will make certain the tax law applies to you.

Notice, in both evaluations exactly the same result will be obtained from the Courts.

Furthermore:

1) Federal judges are appointed for life, and good behaviour. The pay cannot be taken away from them.

2) Federal judges have ruled their pay is subject to income tax, though at any time they could rule otherwise if they so desired and believed otherwise.

3) It would be in the personal and financial interest for the courts to rule that the income tax is unconstitutional and illegal. In so doing the law would be void, the IRS which is authorised under that law would ceased to exist or have power over the people or the courts.

4) Judges are ruling against there own personal interest in support the income tax against you in the courtroom. For if it did not apply to you, it cannot apply to them.

Something is lacking in your protest that judges work for the government, and it is called reason and credibility. It does not pass the test of Occum's razor, nor the laugh test.