Skip to comments.
Kerry Bronze Star Certificate signature questioned. Investigation warranted?
Kerry's PDF Military Files on his Website ^
| 4-15-04
| me
Posted on 04/22/2004 10:49:24 AM PDT by moondoggie
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 701-710 next last
To: Bommer
Hmmph. That is interesting. Probably just a rubber stamp.
To: blau993
SOMEBODY, PLEASE!! Mirror the site, get copies of the docs, don't let 'em disappear! This gaffe will get back to J'Effin's campaign, and they might yank the data, don't let them.
I, too, tried to find some other sig examples for Lehman and Chaffee, to no avail. Yet.
42
posted on
04/22/2004 1:22:06 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Bommer
Sonuvagun!
43
posted on
04/22/2004 1:22:53 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Bommer
hmmmmmmmm.... good work..
Isn't that usualy a sure sign of a forgery?
(unless it is a stamp or signing machine)
44
posted on
04/22/2004 1:26:20 PM PDT
by
Mr. K
(ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,I stole this cuz its funny,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
To: All
His middle initial is L, so:
John L ch~~~
I kinda do the same thing to my signature...
Æ
45
posted on
04/22/2004 1:26:22 PM PDT
by
AgentEcho
(If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
To: AgentEcho
No, his middle initial is "H" for Hubbard.
46
posted on
04/22/2004 1:32:19 PM PDT
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: avg_freeper
Sorry, I thought it was an L and found references to it being L. I stand corrected.
47
posted on
04/22/2004 1:37:15 PM PDT
by
AgentEcho
(If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
To: AgentEcho
No problem. This is his full name:
John (Lester) H(ubbard) Chafee
48
posted on
04/22/2004 1:39:20 PM PDT
by
avg_freeper
(Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
To: avg_freeper
Well fine, if that's the case then :
Joh~ L h c~~~
49
posted on
04/22/2004 1:42:09 PM PDT
by
AgentEcho
(If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
To: AgentEcho
Nevermind, I hit POST before I saw the error. I'm an idiot.
50
posted on
04/22/2004 1:43:11 PM PDT
by
AgentEcho
(If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went. - Will Rogers)
To: america-rules
Why does Kerry call it Mr. Nixon's war when he served under Johnson.
To: blau993
I entered the Navy 21Feb81. Why is the signature of the Secretary of the Navy on my paperwork the same as on Kerry's
To: Cultural Jihad
personal experience. Even if a replacement was requested the original signature would be on it not a new person's signature.
To: Parthalan
That's what we are trying to figure out. Your papers would surely bear the signature of Lehman, not Chaffee. If that signature is the same as the ones on Kerry's two citations, something is strange.
54
posted on
04/22/2004 2:57:16 PM PDT
by
blau993
(Labs for love; .357 for Security.)
To: Bommer
handwriting experts have confirmed that a single person will never sign a signature the EXACT way twice. This is a rubber stamp. The question is if the rubber stamp makes it legit in this case.
To: All
Please, someone tell me this thread is getting sent over to Rush, Hannity, Fox News, and the rest of our folks!
56
posted on
04/22/2004 4:14:53 PM PDT
by
RandallFlagg
(<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com" target="_blank">miserable failure)
To: moondoggie; Carl/NewsMax
Maybe we should just ask Lehman what his signature looks like, I didn't realise he was on the 911 commision. Hey carl, you lurk here, how bout some help.: Monday, April 5, 2004 6:12 p.m. EDT
9/11 Commissioner Lehman Reacts to Clinton-bin Laden Audio
9/11 Commissioner former Navy Secretary John Lehman said Monday that President Bill Clinton's decision not to accept Sudan's offer to extradite Osama bin Laden to the U.S. in 1996 was probably the biggest blunder in the war on terrorism.
Reacting to NewsMax.com's audiotape of Mr. Clinton admitting he turned down the Sudanese, Secretary Lehman told radio host Sean Hannity, "[Clinton's comments offer] a very good insight into the overall policy during the Clinton administration, which was essentially dominated by lawyers [who treated bin Laden] as a law enforcement, not a foreign policy or a prevention issue."
Asked if it was "wrong to conclude that the biggest mistake we made was not taking Osama when we had an opportunity," Lehman told Hannity, "Yes, that's certainly true."
"There were many ways in which [bin Laden] could have been apprehended," he added.
Reacting to comments from 9/11 Commission Chairman Tom Kean, who said yesterday that if the U.S. had nabbed bin Laden while he was in Sudan, "the whole story might have been different," Secretary Lehman told Hannity, "I do agree with that."
The former Reagan administration official said, however, that it was a mistake to focus entirely on the 9/11 mastermind, because al-Qaida is "raising a whole generation of young Arab children and youth to hate America."
"Getting Osama probably would have disrupted the planning [for 9/11]," Lehman said, "but it wasn't just Osama."
To hear NewsMax.com's exclusive audio recording of ex-President Clinton explaining why he turned the Sudanese offer down, Click Here.
Editor's note:
"CATASTROPHE" Reveals the Secret Story Behind 9/11
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
NewsMax Scoops
9/11 Commission
Al-Qaeda
Clinton Scandals
Printer Friendly Version
Reprint Information
57
posted on
04/22/2004 4:17:16 PM PDT
by
eastforker
(The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
To: RandallFlagg
I bet carl will help.
58
posted on
04/22/2004 4:19:09 PM PDT
by
eastforker
(The color of justice is green,just ask Johny Cochran!)
To: RandallFlagg
BTTT
59
posted on
04/22/2004 4:22:11 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: moondoggie; Ragtime Cowgirl
Good catch ...
Heck, GREAT catch!
Yes - Just why DID Sec Lehman (apparently) sign Kerry's medals, when he served 15 years earlier?
But, then again, could you make your titles more effective time?
The one you choose didn't exactly give me any "preview" of just how important this was....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 701-710 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson