Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Procedures for Contacts Procedures for Contacts Between the FBI & CIA Investigations
Office of the Attorney General ^ | July 19, 1995 | janel Reno

Posted on 04/14/2004 12:33:43 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Office of the Attorney General
Washington, DC 20530

July 19, 1995

MEMORANDUM

TO:

FROM: The Attorney General [signed: Janet Reno]

SUBJECT:

The procedures contained herein, unless otherwise specified by the Attorney General, apply to foreign intelligence (FI) and foreign counterintelligence (FCI) investigations conducted by the FBI, including investigations related to espionage and foreign and international terrorism. The purpose of these procedures is to ensure that FI and FCI investigations are conducted lawfully, and that the Department's criminal and intelligence/counterintelligence functions are properly coordinated.

A. Contacts During an FI or FCI Investigation in Which FISA Surveillance or Searches are Being Conducted

1. If, in the course of an FI or FCI investigation utilizing electronic surveillance or physical searches under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), facts or circumstances are developed that reasonably indicate that a significant federal crime has been, is being, or may be committed, the FBI and OIPR each shall independently notify the Criminal Division. Notice to the Criminal Division shall include the facts and circumstances developed during the investigation that support the indication of significant federal criminal activity. The FBI shall inform OIPR when it initiates contact with the Criminal Division. After this initial notification, the Criminal Division shall notify OIPR before engaging in substantive consultations with the FBI, as discussed in paragraph 5, below.

2. The FBI shall not contact a U.S. Attorney's Office concerning such an investigation without the approval of the Criminal Division and OIPR. In exigent circumstances, where immediate contact with a U.S. Attorney's Office is appropriate because of potential danger to life or property, FBIHQ or an FBI field office may make such notification. The Criminal Division and OIPR should be contacted and advised of the circumstances of the investigation and the facts surrounding the notification as soon as possible.

3. If the Criminal Division concludes that the information provided by the FBI or OIPR raises legitimate and significant criminal law enforcement concerns, it shall inform the FBI and OIPR. The Criminal Division may, in appropriate circumstances, contact the pertinent U.S. Attorney's Office for the purpose of evaluating the information. Thereafter, the FBI may consult with the Criminal Division concerning the investigation to the extent described in paragraphs 5 and 6, below.

4. The FBI shall maintain a log of all contacts with the Criminal Division, noting the time and participants involved in any contact, and briefly summarizing the content of any communication.

5. The Criminal Division shall notify OIPR of, and give OIPR the opportunity to participate in, consultations between the FBI and Criminal Division concerning an FI or FCI investigation. If OIPR is unable or does not desire to participate in a particular consultation, the Criminal Division will, after the consultation takes place, orally inform OIPR of the substance of the communication in a timely fashion.

6. Consultations between the Criminal Division and the FBI shall be limited in the following manner: The FBI will apprise the Criminal Division, on a timely basis, of information developed during the FI or FCI investigation that relates to significant federal criminal activity. The Criminal Division may give guidance to the FBI aimed at preserving the option of a criminal prosecution. (For example, the Criminal Division may provide advice on the handling of sensitive human sources so that they would not be compromised in the event of an ultimate decision to pursue criminal prosecution.) The Criminal Division shall not, however, instruct the FBI on the operation, continuation, or expansion of FISA electronic surveillance or physical searches. Additionally, the FBI and Criminal Division should ensure that advice intended to preserve the option of a criminal prosecution does not inadvertently result in either the fact or the appearance of the Criminal Division's directing or controlling the FI or FCI investigation toward law enforcement objectives.

7. In a FISA renewal application concerning such an investigation, OIPR shall apprise the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) of the existence of, and basis for, any contacts among the FBI, the Criminal Division, and a U.S. Attorney's Office, in order to keep the FISC informed of the criminal justice aspects of the ongoing investigation.

8. In the event the Criminal Division concludes that circumstances exist that indicate the need to consider initiation of a criminal investigation or prosecution, it shall immediately notify OIPR. The Criminal Division and OIPR shall contact the pertinent U.S. Attorney's Office as soon thereafter as possible.

9. Any disagreement among the Criminal Division, United States Attorneys, OIPR, and the FBI concerning the application of these procedures in a particular case, or concerning the propriety of initiating a criminal investigation or prosecution, shall be raised with the Deputy Attorney General.

B. Contacts During an FI or FCI Investigation in Which No FISA Surveillance or Searches Are Being Conducted

1. If, in the course of an FI or FCI investigation in which FISA electronic surveillance or physical searches are not being conducted, facts or circumstances are developed that reasonably indicate that a significant federal crime has been, is being, or may be committed, the FBI shall notify the Criminal Division. Notice to the Criminal Division shall include the facts and circumstances developed during the investigation that support the indication of significant federal criminal activity. The Criminal Division may, in appropriate circumstances, contact the pertinent U.S. Attorney's Office for the purpose of evaluating the information.

2. The FBI shall not contact a U.S. Attorney's Office concerning such an investigation without the approval of the Criminal Division, and notice to OIPR. In exigent circumstances, where immediate contact with a U.S. Attorney's Office is appropriate because of potential danger to life or property, FBIHQ or an FBI field office may make such notification. The Criminal Division and OIPR should be contacted and advised of the circumstances of the investigation and the facts surrounding the notification as soon as possible.

3. If the Criminal Division concludes that the information provided by the FBI raises legitimate and significant criminal law enforcement concerns, it shall notify the FBI and OIPR. Thereafter, the FBI may consult with the Criminal Division concerning the investigation.

4. The Criminal Division will be responsible for orally informing OIPR of its contacts and consultations with the FBI concerning such an investigation.

5. The FBI shall maintain a log of all contacts with the Criminal Division, noting the time and participants involved in any contact, and briefly summarizing the content of any communication.

6. In the event the Criminal Division concludes that circumstances exist that indicate the need to consider initiation of a criminal investigation or prosecution, it shall immediately notify OIPR. The Criminal Division and OIPR shall contact the pertinent U.S. Attorney's Office as soon thereafter as possible.

7. If, during an FI or FCI investigation, a FISA electronic surveillance or search is undertaken after the FBI has consulted with the Criminal Division, the procedures set forth in section A., above, shall apply.

8. Any disagreement among the Criminal Division, United States Attorneys, OIPR, and the FBI concerning the application of these procedures in a particular case, or concerning the propriety of initiating a criminal investigation or prosecution, shall be raised with the Deputy Attorney General.


Office of the Attorney General
Washington, DC 20530

July 19, 1995


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1995; doj; intelligence; janetreno; reno; thewall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: ravingnutter
I think it is now obvious that Gorelick was placed on this commission to inoculate her from every testifying. Not only does her knowledge of events make her a prime witness...but the very positions she held and policies she helped implement make her one of the most important witnesses in this investigation. We need to keep up the pressure.
41 posted on 04/14/2004 2:16:29 PM PDT by cwb (Kerry: Sadr is a legitimate voice in Iraq being silenced by America..and Hamas are sorta terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I found a story that dates back to shortly before the Patriot Act was signed on by GWB, that the Patriot Act itself was an Algore idea. As a matter of fact, this bit of information is also corroborated by Newt Gingrich himself when he said that the idea of putting together a Homeland Security administration was a agreeable bipartisan effort in the late 1990's. Some critics at that time said the plan wouldn't do enough, or would do too much.

Bush and the Republican's put the idea on paper, sign it into law, and the Democrats are mad. They've been angry with the Bush administration because he's turned decades of talk into action.

42 posted on 04/14/2004 2:25:18 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
ROFL!
43 posted on 04/14/2004 2:28:19 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: cwb
I think it is now obvious that Gorelick was placed on this commission to inoculate her from every testifying.

Damn right. The fact she's on there is a farce in the first place, considering Clinton is more to lame for 9/11 as the Democrats believe Bush is. I believe she's on the panel to make sure Clinton and his cronies remain off the hook in the end.

44 posted on 04/14/2004 2:29:11 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Liberalism is Communism one drink at a time. - P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
So far that suspicious mind has been proven right more often than not.

Rush said today one of the reasons the RNC isn't making a big deal out of this sort of thing is because they are under instructions from the president to try and "set a new tone in Washington."

I'd say that train left the station over 2 years ago and it's time for the RNC to go nuclear on the DNC.
45 posted on 04/14/2004 3:39:44 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
July19, 1995...three months to the day after the Oklahoma City bombing.
46 posted on 04/14/2004 4:22:33 PM PDT by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I don't think Rush really knows what's going on. I think that is his supposition. He has ranted about the "new tone" ever since the Inauguration.

I think we are being quiet because this is not the time for the President to get into an uproar with the commision. However, individual citizens voicing their outrage is a different story.

47 posted on 04/14/2004 4:22:50 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Britt Hume had Sensebrenner on, I don't think he is gonna be quiet.

Which I think is good.
48 posted on 04/14/2004 4:27:27 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I agree. I just don't think it productive for the President to get into it. Congress (who created the Commission) and individual citizens, as well as the media, should speak out.
49 posted on 04/14/2004 5:20:32 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I wonder how many other dots were not connected due to this wall...

Technology transfers...
All the players in illegal contributions and their illicit connections
Marc Rich

IMHO this wall was just to protect Clinton's sorry a$$. It ended up costing US mightily.

50 posted on 04/14/2004 5:53:52 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cwb
"At home, Clinton doubled the size of the FBI's counterterrorism budget, but the bureau was so slow to hire new agents to combat terrorism that much of the money was never used, according to Gorelick.

Of course Clinton wasn't so much concerned with Foreign Muslim Fundamentalist terrorism as he was with domestic "terrorism" perpetrated by right wing militias. Also with such crimes as abortion clinic bombings, Black church burnings (of which there were none attributed to right wing fanatics), and other "terroristic" actions of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

51 posted on 04/14/2004 7:01:00 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson