To: zygoat
As opposed to those that did not.
47 posted on
04/12/2004 10:47:45 AM PDT by
stuartcr
To: stuartcr
Parse, parse, parse. If you break it into short enough sentences, you may be able to convince yourself that what you are claiming is legitimate.
Remember billyblythe's word game: "I did not have sex with that woman.(period) Ms. Lewinski."
OR
"I did not have sex with that woman (as he looks to Madeline Albright), Ms. Lewinski." (as he imagines himself to be simply speaking TO--not ABOUT--Ms. Lewinski)
Liberal parsing games are transparent: They only work to convince the parser that he is, somehow, succeeding in his trickery.
Lawyer trickery and crap. Scheisters in the German sense of the word.
54 posted on
04/12/2004 11:16:51 AM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: stuartcr
Had a couple of relatives killed Nam. I was too old besides I was in the Korean conflict.
I had a young relative who was the one of the best physical therapists in the Army.... he never went to Nam. He never left CONUS but he worked real hard to rehabiltate some pretty banged up soldiers. He gave 100% and then some!!! He was a real expert on helping guys with missing legs.
Are you saying or inferring that IF you didn't leave the CONUS that you did NOT contribute to the USA war effort? 'Cause if you are, hoss, you are full of______!!
55 posted on
04/12/2004 11:17:55 AM PDT by
Lion in Winter
(I ain't no pussy cat... don't mess with me... ya hear! GRRRRRRrrr)
To: stuartcr
I take you are among those who did not?
122 posted on
08/09/2004 8:20:41 AM PDT by
USVet6792Retired
(Can I just shoot him? It's only a liberal!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson