To: stuartcr
Parse, parse, parse. If you break it into short enough sentences, you may be able to convince yourself that what you are claiming is legitimate.
Remember billyblythe's word game: "I did not have sex with that woman.(period) Ms. Lewinski."
OR
"I did not have sex with that woman (as he looks to Madeline Albright), Ms. Lewinski." (as he imagines himself to be simply speaking TO--not ABOUT--Ms. Lewinski)
Liberal parsing games are transparent: They only work to convince the parser that he is, somehow, succeeding in his trickery.
Lawyer trickery and crap. Scheisters in the German sense of the word.
54 posted on
04/12/2004 11:16:51 AM PDT by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: bannie
What I did say, was legitimate. Nothing more, nothing less. No claims to anything being made.
57 posted on
04/12/2004 11:18:37 AM PDT by
stuartcr
To: bannie
BTTT... well said!!
58 posted on
04/12/2004 11:19:09 AM PDT by
Lion in Winter
(I ain't no pussy cat... don't mess with me... ya hear! GRRRRRRrrr)
To: bannie
Could just be that he is a mere dim bulb on the billboard of life. : ^ )
59 posted on
04/12/2004 11:20:28 AM PDT by
Lion in Winter
(I ain't no pussy cat... don't mess with me... ya hear! GRRRRRRrrr)
To: bannie
It is not a theory it is apparently fact.... a dim bulb in our midst. It twinkles or shines not.
64 posted on
04/12/2004 11:24:38 AM PDT by
Lion in Winter
(I ain't no pussy cat... don't mess with me... ya hear! GRRRRRRrrr)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson