The linked article says nothing about "100% alignment". Are you presuming too much due to your desire that this article is more conclusive than it may actually be?
Remember, we are talking about a discovery appearing in a peer-reviewed scientific journal which requires absolute confirmation of the methodology (though not necessarily the conclusions) that completely adheres to strict scientific methodology.
No, it doesn't. Peer-review helps to weed out the more obviously shaky articles before they make publication, but you're vastly overstating the process when you claim that it "requires absolute confirmation of the methodology".