Posted on 04/09/2004 5:02:33 AM PDT by calcowgirl
SAN FRANCISCO - A state judge on Thursday declined to allow gay marriage opponents to intervene in lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of a California law defining marriage between a man and woman.
The Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the Alliance Defense Fund sought to inject themselves into the case to argue against gay marriage.
San Francisco County Superior Court Judge James Warren declined the request, saying the groups would not be harmed however the litigation ends.
In 2000, 4.6 million Californians approved Proposition 22 defining marriage as a union of a woman and man.
San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom sued earlier this year to overturn the law, alleging the state constitution would permit a gay marriage. Six gay couples also sued and the two groups wanted to intervene in those cases.
Newsoms administration married about 4,000 couples earlier this year before the California Supreme Court halted them. In different litigation, the high court is mulling whether Newsom had the authority to distribute the same-sex marriage licenses.
Robert Tyler, an attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, said the Arizona-based conservative group may appeal Warrens decision.
We have been prevented from being allowed to present a defense, Tyler said.
Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights who is representing the gay couples in one of the lawsuits, said the judge declined to allow undue influence by an outside group with no direct interest in the case.
Attorneys for the Proposition 22 Legal Defense and Education Fund had argued that the group should be permitted to participate in the case on behalf of the state because its members had voted for the successful ballot measure that defined marriage as heterosexual.A successful challenge to state marriage laws would neutralize those votes, said Alliance Defense Fund lawyer Robert Tyler, who is representing the Proposition 22 organization.
Tyler also questioned state Atty. Gen. Bill Lockyers commitment to vigorous defense of state marriage laws, noting that Lockyer was considering a run for higher office and had publicly stated his opposition to laws that discriminate against gays and lesbians.
We have an attorney general whose political perspective is far different from the one he has to defend, Tyler argued.
|
|
|
![]() |
Donate Here By Secure Server
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
|
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.