Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America no longer white, united, English-speaking
The Miami Herald ^ | 02 April 2004 | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 04/03/2004 11:22:26 AM PST by MegaSilver

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,021-1,027 next last
To: All
I have never met a 7 year old that has been in our country for 3 years that doesn't speak english.
The problem is in 2050 nobody in mexico city will speak spanish, they will all speak english. English is a week and nothing is going to change that.
101 posted on 04/03/2004 12:27:27 PM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18
I'm not claiming that non-whites aren't real Americans. I am vigorously stating that America is facing an influx of non-whites that it won't be able to assimilate. And if every non-white nation on earth has the right to decide that it wants to retain a certain racial makeup or balance, should that be denied to majoriy-white nations?

I always thought that the citizens of a nation had the right to decide who joins them through immigration to become fellow citizens. This shouldn't be decided by a hole in a fence, or corrupt politicians and business leaders.

102 posted on 04/03/2004 12:29:05 PM PST by BushMeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
I believe it was the great Ronald Reagan that laid the wreath to which you're referring.

Should I presume that you consider yourself a conservative (since you frequent this forum). Well then, what kind? I gather you're not a Bush, Reagan, or Buchanan, type.

103 posted on 04/03/2004 12:29:21 PM PST by iconoclast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Aside from Japan and a few Pacific rim nations, can you think of any other "Non-White" "First World" nations aside from maybe Bermuda or Cayman?

"First World" is a cold war terminology which is outdated. It means America and it's allies and included poor countries. Second world was the Soviet union and its allies. Third world was the non-aligned.

If you use the term developed, developing and underdeveloped, then the majority of the developed nations (total number barely two dozen) ARE white, but there are non-Caucasians there like the Japanese, Koreans and Singaporeans (and many do put the Malaysians in there too). When you talk about developing there ARE many Caucasian devloping nations (like the ones in Eastern Europe, India etc.).
104 posted on 04/03/2004 12:29:44 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
Mexico is a good bit older than we are from pre-colonial times.

Huh? The first European colonists here came from monarchies and the remnants of old feudalistic cultures. How did they manage to form a liberal constitutional republic? If those immigrants were bound by the political structure of their countries of origin why should Mexican immigrants and their descendants by guided by the same?

105 posted on 04/03/2004 12:29:50 PM PST by garbanzo (Free people will set the course of history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Maybe we should start of list of white non first world countries. I'll start first. Argentina. Your turn.

Sorry! Argentina is economically in the periphery or 3rd world.

106 posted on 04/03/2004 12:29:53 PM PST by navyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
California - invaded by millions of illegal aliens from failed, third world regimes,

California -- invaded by millions of illegals from Central AMERICA.
107 posted on 04/03/2004 12:31:21 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #108 Removed by Moderator

To: iconoclast
I do consider myself to be a conservative as far as principles go in terms of gun rights, abortion,etc.
109 posted on 04/03/2004 12:31:43 PM PST by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: alabamaqueen
Don't get snippy with me newbie. Please you can't begin to talk to me about white people in Zimbabwe. Take your uninformed post elsewhere.
110 posted on 04/03/2004 12:33:02 PM PST by cyborg (Frankenfreude radio death watch has commenced)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
as is Costa Rica....both are rather White Hispano nations btw same as Argentina which is the "whitest" nation in Latin America.

Costa Rica WHITE???? Caucasia? Ha. They're little less mestizo than the Mexicans
111 posted on 04/03/2004 12:34:33 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: alabamaqueen
restore immigration to only White, English-speaking Christians.

Wow.

112 posted on 04/03/2004 12:35:40 PM PST by Dog Gone (End Freepathons. Join the Dollar a Day Club!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Uruguay is another white disappointment. And then we have Serbia.

Moldavia, Russia, Romania, Belarus, Armenia, Georgia, Bosnia, Albania, Poland, Bulgaria, etc. white, non-developed nations.
113 posted on 04/03/2004 12:36:51 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
People say that what happened in Beirut was a shame because, in the past, it was a shining example of a diverse, multicultural city.

Beirut was NOT a multi-cultural city. It was a Lebanese city, it was a multi-religious city, but all the people were Semitic in origin.
114 posted on 04/03/2004 12:37:37 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
It has to be pointed out to many here on FR that the republican party in not a conservative party, regardless of what context Pat uses.

Pat thinks the GOP should merge with the KKK
115 posted on 04/03/2004 12:38:10 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Alabama? Probably have "slaves in the family". (btw, good book)
116 posted on 04/03/2004 12:38:40 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: BushMeister
I am vigorously stating that America is facing an influx of non-whites that it won't be able to assimilate.

How do you know that? Anyone stating that they know how the country will be in 44 years is deluded. All of these speculations are based on the term "Hispanic" as a racial term, which it is not. Chances are the term won't even exist in 2050- it didn't exist in 1960 on the Census. I believe that the immigrants here today will be assimulated Americans- and I have history on my side. People made the same gloom and doom pronouncements in 1904- of course, the emphasis was on keeping the country Northern European. Many of the whites complaining today about those people ruining the ethnic balance would have been "those people" a century ago.

117 posted on 04/03/2004 12:39:30 PM PST by LWalk18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: PISANO
I just don't understand why mentioning WHITE in virtually any context is considered RACIST?

Because it's stupid classifying people by the color of their skin -- black is equally dumb categorization. But differentiating between white and brown CAUCASIANS is ludicrous. So, folks change their race when they get a tan?????
118 posted on 04/03/2004 12:39:47 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
More Pat blather

Meaning you don't like Pat or you disagree with what he is saying?

119 posted on 04/03/2004 12:40:01 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ronnieb
IF Pat is such a racist, because he dares to notice the racial change in America, then is Sharon, and the entire state of Isreal racist because they notice and care about the percentage of Jews that are in Isreal

Jews and ARabs are both of the same race: Semitic. So, Arabs can't be anti-Semitic as that would mean they're anti-themselves.
120 posted on 04/03/2004 12:40:50 PM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,021-1,027 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson