Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Other Harry
very little scientific benefit in sending people to Mars. Virtually none at all. Close to zero

That's seems a very narrow definition of scientific benefit, or you and I differ on what's beneficial for science.

The discovery of water and bodies of water on Mars, in my opinion, is benefical to the study of Earth geology. Because it raises the question, why did Mars lose its water, and by extension why did it lose its atmosphere. Could something similar happen here on earth?

Considering what we're learning about the two planets shifting magentic field, I'd say study of Mars is fairly pertinent.

47 posted on 04/01/2004 5:50:11 PM PST by mikenola
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: mikenola
Considering what we're learning about the two planets shifting magentic field, I'd say study of Mars is fairly pertinent.

I'm not arguing about studying Mars or space in general. I am with you that far. Completely.

But what are our priorities? Fight terrorism? Provide Social Security benefits? Put people on the moon? Cut taxes? Redevelop inter-city areas?

Maybe you want to do it all. I see it like a family budget. In that context, the manned space flights go into the garbage bin. We can't do everything. Maybe you can; I cannot.

48 posted on 04/01/2004 6:07:49 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson