Albright Worries Bush Fuels Hate for U.S. (big barf alert)

Yeah, I'm sure the world loved us after we bombed the crap out of the Serbs, eh, Maddie? Who was more flippant than her? "If they don't comply, we bomb." I'll never forget that. Maddie, dressed up like your fat granny, loud pearl necklace, big earrings..."we bomb." I could almost smell that baby-powder-smelling perfume from here. shudder

What a nasty woman.

41 posted on 03/30/2004 10:25:16 PM PST by FlyVet

Better to be hated and feared as conqueors, then to be hated and despised as prey.

42 posted on 03/30/2004 10:55:16 PM PST by Belisaurius ("Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, Ted" - Joseph Kennedy 1958)

Wrong - Madwoman. Since I have been knee high, I have watched the "death to america" crowds chanting in the streets in islamofascist states.

43 posted on 03/30/2004 11:02:35 PM PST by reed_inthe_wind (Vienna said the middlemen come from Ger, Nether,Belg, S Af, Jap,Dub, Mal,USA,Rus,Chin,and Pak.)

44 posted on 03/30/2004 11:14:18 PM PST by Howlin

Oh did Madeleine Albright go to glamour shots?

45 posted on 03/31/2004 9:19:47 AM PST by april15Bendovr

To: april15Bendovr

46 posted on 03/31/2004 10:28:21 AM PST by Howlin

Thank God this woman is no longer the Secretarty of State. She is a danger to this country and she knows absolutely nothing about terrorists if she is concerned about how we might make them hate us more.

IMHO, a terrorist is one who has allowed hatred to overcome reason destroying their own identity. Terrorist groups use their hatred to recruit individuals with a weak identity to become weapons in their war of destruction. These groups cannot be defused without removing the core hatred. This can only be accomplished by a total destruction of the group’s leadership or change from within the group itself. Attempts from outside to reason with terrorists will be repulsed as their hatred has become their identity.

Albright said she believed, as the Bush Administration did, that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but she questioned the wisdom of a pre-emptive strike against Iraq.

This is the same reasoning that gave us 9-11. We knew Iraq harbored terrorists and they refused to disclose all of their weapons. Without a pre-emptive strike we will never be able to prevent terrorist attacks. We cannot protect every potential target. No matter how good our intelligence is they will always be able to find a soft target.

She said the Clinton administration used every tool it had to determine the right targets and acted when it could on the intelligence it had.

Yet they did NOTHING to stop the growth of global terrorism. They were too worried we might make them upset with us.

47 posted on 03/31/2004 7:03:36 PM PST by eggman (Social Insecurity - Who will provide for the government when the government provides for all of us?)

Apparently, according to Kerry, "alarming potential foes" is a bad thing!

We don't alarm them, they won't alarm us...

Until they kill a few thousand more Americans.

48 posted on 03/31/2004 7:15:51 PM PST by eggman (Social Insecurity - Who will provide for the government when the government provides for all of us?)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794