Deceit is the last resort of those who can't make a rational argument.
Your definition of preemptive war is false and deceptive having nothing to do with your "example."
Global Crossing cannot be compared to Loral. GC cannot make the Chinese rockets work better nor can it provide ANYTHING of great significance to China. You lose any chance at credibility with such inept comparisions. Paranoia is not a winning political condition.
What I "get" is that you are making false allegations and comparisions between entities and people that are not comparable.
Your definition of preemptive war is false and deceptive having nothing to do with your "example." OK -- I'll accept that. I want you to: 1) define "preemptive war" for me; and 2) describe what aspect of it is so "brilliant" on the part of Messrs. Perle, Wolfowitz, and Feith.
GC cannot make the Chinese rockets work better nor can it provide ANYTHING of great significance to China.
Bullsh!t. Then why would the company need a waiver from the U.S. Department of Defense in order to sell its fiber-optic technology to China?
Ask yourself an honest question here: Would you be making these excuses for Bernard Schwartz if Loral had been selling fiber-optic technology to Red China in 1996 instead of guidance system technology?
I didn't think so.