Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
So you're saying the invasion wouldn't occur if Perle didn't exist?

That's an interesting question. Probably yes -- assuming someone else with connections in the U.S. government had undertaken the 1996 effort with the Netanyahu government in israel.

Any way Clinton did try to create the environment to support an invasion. His initiative failed. And he didn't have the gumption of 9/11 to spice up the motivation to finish Gulf War I.

How did Clinton try to "create the environment" to support an invasion? And are you saying that the Bush administration has used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq?

28 posted on 03/31/2004 6:03:23 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE north strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
So you're saying the invasion wouldn't occur if Perle didn't exist?

That's an interesting question. Probably yes -- assuming someone else with connections in the U.S. government had undertaken the 1996 effort with the Netanyahu government in israel.

You're whole argument is based on the assumption that some report related to Jews is the founding and source document of our military involvement with Iraq. Consider whether you have been misled by people with a jew-baiting agenda.

Any way Clinton did try to create the environment to support an invasion. His initiative failed. And he didn't have the gumption of 9/11 to spice up the motivation to finish Gulf War I.

How did Clinton try to "create the environment" to support an invasion? And are you saying that the Bush administration has used 9/11 as an excuse to invade Iraq?

ILA, approaches to France and Russia due to their security council veto, Clinton's ridiculous road trip to campuses with Cohen and Albright to test the waters of public support - it's all there. It didn't start with naming some Israeli. It started in 1990.

As for Bush, kind of. The "excuse" is misleading. There were many "reasons", all of them valid or not, primarily we were already their, protecting Kurd automomy, enforcing sanctions and no-fly zones and such.

There were only three outcomes. We could pull out. Result - Kurdish genocide and loss of respect. We could maintain "containment" ie the food for oil regime, sanctions, suffereing of the Iraqi people with no end in sight. Or we could finish the war. 9/11 focused people and gave the fire in the belly to finish off our responsibility. In short-we were already there. What to do?

55 posted on 03/31/2004 10:13:06 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson