Skip to comments.
Michael Badnarik [Libertarian candidate for President 2004]
Badnarik ^
| 3/29/04
| Badnarik
Posted on 03/29/2004 12:42:13 PM PST by freedom44
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
1
posted on
03/29/2004 12:42:13 PM PST
by
freedom44
To: freedom44
whatever....
To: freedom44; biblewonk
Toke 'em if you got 'em!
;O) ;O)
3
posted on
03/29/2004 12:45:55 PM PST
by
newgeezer
(Sarcasm content: 100.00%)
To: freedom44
"Michael doesn't have enough information to know whether or not the United States should be there"
At least he is able to admit he has no idea what he is doing.
4
posted on
03/29/2004 12:47:17 PM PST
by
Redcoat LI
("help to drive the left one into the insanity.")
To: freedom44
I would never vote for a Libritarian ticket because of the drug issue. I have known too many people who are burnt out from grass or have moved on to other drugs that have burnt their brains. It may be costly but the war on drugs does some good.
5
posted on
03/29/2004 12:47:59 PM PST
by
wvnavyvet
To: freedom44
I am in agreement with most of the Libertarian position. However, I would not waste my vote, voting a Libertarian for President. That is silly. Build a base at the grass roots level and start electing Libertarians in school boards, in city councils, then State houses and State senates. Then go on to the U.S. House and Senate, then the Presidency.
The Libertarians want all the marbles without going through the preliminaries. Their strategy sucks, as does virtually all the minor political parties.
I'll vote Bush, even though I have problems with the 'Pub agenda.
Blessings, Bobo
6
posted on
03/29/2004 12:51:20 PM PST
by
bobo1
To: freedom44
'Michael' wants violent criminals to submit book reports once a week.
Please tell me this is a joke. Somebody!
Oh well, at least he's not Harry Browne.
The LP has apparently become an irrelevant circle-jerk squadron, controlled by utopians. John Hospers must be disappointed.
7
posted on
03/29/2004 12:57:58 PM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: headsonpikes
Unfortunately the Libertarian Party's position on the war on terror is the same as the Democrat Party. Make sure we have plenty of body bags and arrest the guys who planted the bombs. True insanity.
This could be the reason why the Libertarian Party and Democrat Party's chances of carrying, Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana, North Carolina, Virginia, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Texas, Florida, Oklahoma, Kansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Utah, Idaho, Arizona, Nevada and Nebraska are the same.
8
posted on
03/29/2004 1:21:49 PM PST
by
Patrick1
To: freedom44
Please don't post this crapola. JimRob has already made it clear on stupid 3rd parties mucking up the works.
9
posted on
03/29/2004 1:23:00 PM PST
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: freedom44
More recently Michael came to the logical conclusion that the baby must eventually claim ownership of ITS own body, as well.This guy is a regular Rhoades Scholar.
To: wvnavyvet
It may be costly but the war on drugs does some good. What good? Drugs are cheaper now than ever before, a clear sign that the WOD is failing to stop drug manufacturing, importation or sales. But even though they're cheap, they still have a big profit margin. Their illegal status artificially inflates the price of drugs, so the providers have incredible amounts of money -- enough to work any effectiveness of the WOD into the price of doing business.
Basic economics says we will lose this war.
To: bobo1
Build a base at the grass roots level and start electing Libertarians in school boards, in city councils, then State houses and State senates. Then go on to the U.S. House and Senate, then the Presidency. 603 Libertarians in public offices nationwide
To: BlkConserv
603 Libertarians in public offices nationwide Whoop-dee-dar-doo. So there's some Losertarians holding county and municipal posts.
13
posted on
03/29/2004 1:33:59 PM PST
by
ServesURight
(FReecerely Yours,)
To: bobo1
That is silly. Build a base at the grass roots level and start electing Libertarians in school boards, in city councils, then State houses and State senates. They're working on that. Much of the news on the LP site is of such small victories. I think the run for President is more symbolic and a way to get their message out.
But I don't think they can win for one main reason: The Republicrats campaign on left/right agenda issues and can get the big left/right block of votes. The Libertarians campaign on the Constitution, which spans the left and right agendas, meaning they could only get a small piece of the pie of each side.
To: BlkConserv
The site map would not respond to anything that is beyond Idaho, which I thought was strange. As for me, I usually vote for the Libertarian position at lower levels, unless it is close and I think that the rats might win. However, in national elections, there is too much at stake to throw a vote away.
Blessings, Bobo
15
posted on
03/29/2004 1:36:17 PM PST
by
bobo1
To: freedom44
Someone post a picture of the "Blue" guy from Montana?
16
posted on
03/29/2004 1:40:50 PM PST
by
Wheee The People
(Oo ee oo ah ah, ting tang, walla-walla bing bang. Oo ee oo ah ah, ting tang, walla-walla bing bang!)
To: ServesURight
The LP is a joke, but it's on the national level. My previous post was just an FYI to the other poster. Libertarians hold important positions in city, school board, and county administration, as well as judicial positions.
The LP has some great ideas but they're too consumed with the War on Drugs, gambling, and legalizing prostitution. They're just not a viable political party. Better to stick with the GOP and keep the heat on the RINOs, than to throw your vote away to malcontents who'll cause the Rat to win.
Plus I'm still mad at Ed Thompson and the LP here in Wisconsin, who threw the race to Jim Doyle in 2002.
To: antiRepublicrat
The Libertarians campaign on the Constitution, which spans the left and right agendas, meaning they could only get a small piece of the pie of each side.
Bobo: Never minding the fact that the Public at large has not read the Constitution, the Federalist/Anti-federalist papers, or even have a poor grasp of history, libertarianism will remain at the fringes of society. Without a major upheaval in this present world, liberty will continue to diminish until "1984" is a reality.
Ah! to have read and understand what the founding father's would have done. I pray that someday we can develop such a backbone as they had.
Blessings, Bobo
18
posted on
03/29/2004 1:46:16 PM PST
by
bobo1
To: bobo1
Never minding the fact that the Public at large has not read the Constitution, the Federalist/Anti-federalist papers, or even have a poor grasp of history, libertarianism will remain at the fringes of society. My wife and I are now working out the logistics of homeschooling our kids. One thing they will learn is all the above, and learn it by heart. Since they're dual German citizenship they'll also learn the Grundgesetz, but hopefully they'll see how much better ours is.
BTW, anyone in NC who homeschools and can give advice, please FReepmail.
To: newgeezer
I think I saw this guy at the last LP convention.
20
posted on
03/29/2004 2:09:29 PM PST
by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(I am trying to stop an outbreak here and you are driving the monkey to the airport!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson