[TomGuy]

It seems the tone the Dems are trying to develop is:

Condi bad, inefficient, incompetent.

Clarke hero, unsung hero, hero to the masses, who wasn't listened to but who had all the right answers and would have won the War on Terrorism if Condi would have just listened to him and GW would have appointed him Homeland Security Secretary.

[That about covers it.]

[Howlin]

And in a "60 Minutes" interview set to air Sunday night, Clarke blasts Bush for doing "a terrible job on the war against terrorism."

But just a year ago Clarke was singing a different tune, telling reporter Richard Miniter, author of the book "Losing bin Laden," that it was the Clinton administration - not team Bush - that had dropped the ball on bin Laden.

Clarke, who was a primary source for Miniter's book, detailed a meeting of top Clinton officials in the wake of al Qaeda's attack on the USS Cole in Yemen.

He urged them to take immediate military action. But his advice found no takers.

[Mo1]

It seems the tone the Dems are trying to develop is:
Condi bad, inefficient, incompetent

The left has been trying to make a fight between the CIA and Condi since day one ... Kinds of reminds me of stories I've read of the Nixon Days

[hobbes1]

It seems the tone the Dems are trying to develop is:
Condi bad, inefficient, incompetent.

Of course, who better to smear as incompetent as a Strong Black Woman.

They Fear Condi. And they are laying the gorundwork against her for 08, to help HRH Hillary!ous.

[hobbes1]

It seems the tone the Dems are trying to develop is:
Condi bad, inefficient, incompetent.

Of course, who better to smear as incompetent as a Strong Black Woman.

They Fear Condi. And they are laying the groundwork against her for 08, to help HRH Hillary!ous.