Live Thread - September 11 Commission, Day 2, Wednesday, March 24, 2004

CSPAN 3, CBS webfeed ^ | March 24, 2004

[TomGuy]

Live thread for Day 2 of the September 11 Commission Hearings.

CSPAN 3 seems to be the only CSPAN covering this in various formats. http://www.c-span.org/watch/index.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3&ShowVidDays=30&ShowVidDesc=

Also CBS webfeed opens Real Player. http://cgi.cbs.com/video/video.pl?url=/broadcast/*/livenews.rm&plugin=1&proto=rtsp

CBS news website may have other feed formats.

[Howlin]

Well, guess what..............CNN and MSNBC are reading from an EMAIL that Clarke send to Condi Rice a few days AFTER 9-11.....and it also contradicts his book!

[Mo1]

I hope they were busy because of outraged American's like me!!!!

I have a feeling they were .. they put me on hold for a few minutes

[BigSkyFreeper]

For the same reason a whole host of Clinton lackeys became part of that media organ. They're all liberals.

[coloradomom]

Thanks for the info on Condi's interview. I agree with you about the commission. I believe that with their performance today they lost all credibility.

[Mo1]

When do we start massing in the streets in support of our President?

Don't know about that .. but email everyone you know to get the truth of what is going on

The liberal media may try to hide this .. so it's up to us to get it out there

[StriperSniper]

It just keeps getting better. :)

[BigSkyFreeper]

He only changed his story because he wasn't doing the job afforded him. He's blaming Bush for not being tougher on terrorism, because that was his job. Bush can't be doing everything in the White House, that's why Presidents have a plethora of cabinet members each given a task to carry out and report to the President, who has the final say.

[BigSkyFreeper]

My father stopped by a while ago, and I asked him if my Mom and him were watching any of these hearings, and dad said he was watching it off and on, and I told him what I said in that e-mail I fired off to the commission. If we're going to find out what really happend on 9/11, we're not going to find out anything regarding 9/11 and the threats of terrorism from this partisan commission.

[areafiftyone]

LOL

[brydic1]

Indeed, it is sick that the RINOs, all appointed to the commission by Bush to make this commission bi-partisan, for the most part, do little or nothing to point out the obvious discrepancies in the testimony of Clarke, Cohen, Albright,Berger, et al. This is just one more example of naivete of the President and his advisors in handling their own defense, while the media and the Rats make hay in subjecting the administration to a full court press, w/o a response from the so-called republican members of the commission.

[Republican Red]

Welcome to R.A.M.

Decoder ring and secret handshake to follow shortly.

I too, am a member in good standing. Even called the 911 commission and attacked the poor woman answering the phone. Attack first apologize later.

[Wait4Truth]

John Dean has the next Bush-hating book coming out, you know. It is called "Worse Than Watergate", I believe. There will also be one by Kitty Kelley, the gossipy writer that wrote that hateful screed about Nancy Reagan. Also, I heard Bob Woodward has an anti-Bush book coming out this year, too. We have only just begun to see the entire co-ordinated attempt to take President Bush down. Massing in the streets is what we may need to do. The RATS/media are going to be rolling out scandal after scandal, too - they know that if they can get a lot of stuff out there, some of it will stick. The truth and facts mean nothing now. They only care about one thing -removing President Bush from office. We all need to remain aware of that fact.

[Republican Red]

I think Woodward's book is pro-Bush. Not sure though. His "Bush at War" was very complimentary towards the President.

[baseballmom]

I am now an official member of the Republican Attack Machine and proud of it!

LOL . I just went to my first Bush/Cheney 04 meeting last night. I'm a proud member of the Republican Attack Machine - Pennsylvania Chapter. LOL

I am so ticked off over this travesty, I'm going to work harder and send more money. Take THAT 'Rats.

[Wait4Truth]

Bush at War was a pretty fair book. However, I did hear that this next one is anti...just the rumor. I hope I'm wrong and would be happy to be so.

[StarFan]

Thanks. Probably missed it when I was screaming at the TV.

[BigSkyFreeper]

I think Woodward's book is pro-Bush.

That's not what I've been hearing lately.