To: phenn
Judge Greer declined to issue a ruling today and stated that he would do so within the next few days. He also suggested that the 1996 court order, which was issued by another judge, should be revisited in court so that the term 'significant change' could be determined. I don't mean to sound gloom and doom, but in the past when judge oGreer declined to rule directly in court on a matter, but instead ruled a few days later 'by fax', it was because he knew his ruling would stink to high heaven. It also took him a few days to scrounge the gutters for the most palatable legalstink to pad his rulings.
As for 'revisiting the 1996 order', that sounds like a tip-off that oGreer would not have allowed the Schindlers ANY visability into Terri's condition, and he is trying to justify negating that earlier court order.
...the oGreer needs to be voted out of office in November 2004!
To: FL_engineer
As unbelievable as it all continues to be, I'm inclined to agree with your assessment. In the hands of Pinellas and Pasco county, it seems impossible that Terri Schindler and her family will ever be granted even the most meager portion of human justice. Only God can help Terri, and I continue to pray for divine justice.
39 posted on
03/26/2004 2:07:34 PM PST by
lonevoice
(Some things have to be believed to be seen)
To: FL_engineer
Terri would be getting better care if she were in Iraq, or in fact, were an Iraqi.
45 posted on
03/26/2004 3:40:03 PM PST by
floriduh voter
(http://www.conservative-spirit.org/ Invite to my Site)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson