Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons
What you stated proves why my idea will never happen, not why it's wrong. ;o) My bigge$t hurdle would be convincing the churche$ to get with the progam, though pulling out how well they did, back when they held all of the power might offer them a bit of incentive.

I'm waiting to see the results of the recent case of the priest arrested for performing a same sex cerimony, in NY I think.
35 posted on 03/20/2004 11:47:30 PM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: GoLightly
Priest? It was a Unitarian MINISTER and a RABBI,on the steps of City Hall, in Manhattan.

The Catholic church,after Christianity had been around for more than a millennia ( as in several 100s of years more ),got into marrying people for the power and the money.But many nations were STILL involved with marriage,as sin recording them,etc.

Rabbis can still issue divorce decrees, but our government demands that secular ones must take precedent, as it does with Catholic annulments.

Your idea is based solely upon your own ideas, with no basis in historical fact,which is something else you need to consider.And religious bodies ( churches,temples,mosques, Wiccan groves/circles have NO incentive, whatsoever,to go against prevailing laws of the land.

The last time the " church " had the kind of power you're alluding to, was before the Protestant Reformation.

36 posted on 03/21/2004 12:00:13 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: GoLightly
And WHAT has any of this to do with the article? NOTHING!
37 posted on 03/21/2004 12:00:54 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson