Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HAL9000; John Robinson; Jim Robinson
SEEMS TO ME, JOHN R would do well to set up the posting function to screen out more than X lines from the prohibited sources. I don't want to see Jim and FR hassled or at risk from ignorant or thoughtless posts from prohibited sources.

It should not be left to volunteer modes and abuse buttons. Make the software prevent hazards. Of course, people would need to insure that the sources were accurately credited so the screening would be accurate.
405 posted on 03/15/2004 4:24:59 PM PST by Quix (Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
SEEMS TO ME, JOHN R would do well to set up the posting function to screen out more than X lines from the prohibited sources.

He is checking the Source URL for obvious cases (washingtonpost.com, latimes.com, etc.) - but that method won't screen out syndicated articles from those sources on other web sites.

For some reason, a few users believe it is okay to post the full text of a Washington Post article if it is syndicated and reprinted on another news site. That is incorrrect. Those articles should be excerpted too.

433 posted on 03/15/2004 4:55:32 PM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 405 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson