Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
. . . and tell us why we shouldn't study it to see if it can be attributed to ongoing processes.

Why would I want to do a thing like that? After all, the entire universe IS attributed to ongoing processes. It IS the object and subject of scientific study. It exhibits ongoing processes that make sense. Sense implies intelligence, and intelligence implies design.

We may study any object we wish. In the end we will see dynamic processes (even with inanimate substances) that maintain a good many of the attributes of both intelligence and design.

But what I'd really like to see is an example of data and processes organizing themselves without guiding principles or laws or intelligence or design. If you can cite an example of this I would like to know about it.

425 posted on 03/16/2004 6:53:26 AM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
But what I'd really like to see is an example of data and processes organizing themselves without guiding principles or laws or intelligence or design.

How about a snowflake?

427 posted on 03/16/2004 7:09:45 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson