Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
The first two sentences are false.

Oh?

It's considered proper etiquette to cite your sources. (So says PatrickHenry )


The next two sentences are perhaps literally true but are hollow as "challenges."

HMmmm.. perhaps.... Can something bee TRUE and NOT be 'literally' true?

137 posted on 03/13/2004 8:07:23 PM PST by Elsie (When the avalanche starts... it's too late for the pebbles to vote....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
More creo amnesia, Elsie? What if I made you recap every point you wanted remembered, on every thread?

Toward sentence one, here! A sampling of transitionals. Not rare. Predicted by evolution, scoffed at by creationism. Found.

Toward sentence two, here! Reptilian features of Archaeopteryx. As to more and more scientists deciding that Archy is not a transitional, who the hell are they? I think it's the same five guys each year. (Wells, Meyer, Dembski, Berlinski, and Johnson.)

HMmmm.. perhaps.... Can something bee TRUE and NOT be 'literally' true?

The question is whether something can be true and not what some ingenious idiot cracks it up to be.

141 posted on 03/13/2004 8:20:35 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie
It's considered proper etiquette to cite your sources. (So says PatrickHenry )

Note that I was making an assertion, not cutting and pasting someone else's words. And there's no reason for you to be unfamiliar with the evo position by now, Elsie.

161 posted on 03/14/2004 7:36:28 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson