Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Diddle E. Squat
My credibility is not in question. The voting machine's is. Reciepts are not the answer. Paper ballots with proper auditing is.
39 posted on 03/13/2004 10:05:05 AM PST by Andy_Stephenson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Andy_Stephenson
You're trying to convince us of something, but in your arguments put forth a statement that was refuted, so you're credibility may be questioned. Why should we believe you? You can provide evidence, examples, and arguments, but if some of your arguments are easily seen to be false and refuted, then it undermines your credibility, and thus makes others skeptical about whether the other things you advocate are as you present them. Doesn't mean that you are wrong, but it weakens your position, at least temporarily.

Hey, if I'm not from Ft. Worth, I might not know what the paper's true political leanings were either.

And like I said, I too am against electronic voting, its just another tool the Democrats can exploit for vote fraud. But one apparently that they are also afraid might be exploited against them. Why do I focus on Democrats? Because 90+% of the cases of vote fraud that I've come across have been attempts by the Dems.
40 posted on 03/13/2004 10:19:52 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat ("I'm Diddle E. Squat, and I approved this tagline")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson