To: Diddle E. Squat
My credibility is not in question. The voting machine's is. Reciepts are not the answer. Paper ballots with proper auditing is.
To: Andy_Stephenson
You're trying to convince us of something, but in your arguments put forth a statement that was refuted, so you're credibility may be questioned. Why should we believe you? You can provide evidence, examples, and arguments, but if some of your arguments are easily seen to be false and refuted, then it undermines your credibility, and thus makes others skeptical about whether the other things you advocate are as you present them. Doesn't mean that you are wrong, but it weakens your position, at least temporarily.
Hey, if I'm not from Ft. Worth, I might not know what the paper's true political leanings were either.
And like I said, I too am against electronic voting, its just another tool the Democrats can exploit for vote fraud. But one apparently that they are also afraid might be exploited against them. Why do I focus on Democrats? Because 90+% of the cases of vote fraud that I've come across have been attempts by the Dems.
40 posted on
03/13/2004 10:19:52 AM PST by
Diddle E. Squat
("I'm Diddle E. Squat, and I approved this tagline")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson