[Marianne]

FYI
(emphasis added)

[concerned about politics]

A question looming just around the corner is whether the unvested member of a same-sex partner who is vested to get Social Security benefits will be entitled to get a portion of the vested partner's benefits.

Yep. Because they don't have natural love or normal spouses, they can just pass on their SS survival bennies on to a friend who's genitals they play with - at the rest of societies expense!!

"Hi. I'm Steve. I play with my friend Ted's penis, so he should get Social Security benefits paid for by the American taxpayers when I die."

[GovernmentShrinker]

I'm opposed to government licensing/registration/regulation of ANY type of marriage, but if adding gays to the ranks of the government-recognized ranks of the married will hasten the collapse of the socialist entitlement system, then I'm all for it. We can get government out of marriage afterwards.

[EdReform]

Ping

What We Can Do To Help Defeat the "Gay" Agenda

Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)

The Stamp of Normality

[Tribune7]

Freep the poll

[genefromjersey]

Now the REAL REASON for the big push to legalize gay marriages becomes clear : M-O-N-E-Y !!!

[moehoward]

bump

[Old Professer]

The moral of the story, then as now, is that they never tell you about the difficult part.

Neither side in this era of the sound-bite and the quick rhetorical trigger is talking about the difficult part of the story.

I knew when I got this far that the author was trying, but I figured he would give in before the end and use the real word that comes to mind:

This then, is the hard part.

[Ohioan]

While the writer is doubtless correct as to the consequences of embracing madness, in the particular regard discussed; it seems to me that this is the wrong approach to the question. To even go this far is to accord a level of intellectual credibility to an "idea," the only conceivable argument for which is that its proponents have simply changed the meaning of a lot of once very well understood words.

But you cannot change reality by changing terminology. "Homosexual marriage" is an obvious oxymoron. The "Homosexual family" is an obvious oxymoron. Corrupting a friendship by a mutual indulgence in perverted acts can hardly provide a basis for sanctifying that friendship. All of the above is obvious to any rational person.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Just think. You'll be able to marry your kids and they'll get your social security benefits.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda ping -

more explanations of how "gay" marriage will contribute immeasurably to the destruction of what's left of a civilized country. (or world.)

Some people like the idea because they think it will usher in TEOTWAWKI, with the promise of a new dawn of libertarian phantasmagoria. Don't bet on it.

Let me know if anyone wants on/off this ping list. It be busy.