Oh fun. Peer review = anonomyous committee of PC foxes determing how the henhouse is to be allocated.
I have an idea. (taken from Bastiat, Mises et al not claiming it's original) How about the people who actually worked for the money that the government is dispensing as largess determining how their money is spent?
I believe he was being sarcastic.
How about the people who actually worked for the money that the government is dispensing as largess determining how their money is spent?
Two ways of doing this I guess: vote on each decision, or elect a representative to do so. Or do you have another idea?