Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hedgetrimmer
hedgetrimmer

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1094376/posts?page=15#15

Bush signed off on steel tariffs. He is hardly what I would call an exemplary free-trade advocate.

Politicians, especially on the international scene,will never allow "free trade" to exist because they are making out like bandits with all the tax dollar giveaways to coerce them into signing "free trade' agreements. So arguing for "free trade" is an exercise in futility.

Then, naturally, so is arguing against it.

Willie Green

I'm not sure why you're saying "horse puckey" when, based on the rest of your reply, I suspect we'd generally be in agreement on this issue. For instance, while you've neglected the economic impact of our bloated regulatory bureaucracy, I do agree that a shift in our tax policy is in order. The federal government should implement a relatively low, flat-rate "revenue tariff" on ALL imported goods while simultaneously reducing the corporate income tax to promote domestic industries and production.

Huh? Who are they producing for? Once you pass your tariff other countries are going to pass retaliatory tariffs and you can say bye-bye to your exports.

The personal income tax isn't a "barrier" to trade, but it is a shackle placed on our own domestic work force.

It's a barrier in as much as it increases the cost of goods.

26 posted on 03/09/2004 9:33:38 PM PST by explodingspleen (When life gets complex, multiply by the complex conjugate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: *"Free" Trade
bump
27 posted on 03/09/2004 10:53:28 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: explodingspleen
Huh? Who are they producing for? Once you pass your tariff other countries are going to pass retaliatory tariffs and you can say bye-bye to your exports.
If all of these tariffs and counter-tariffs are put in place then we go back to the 1700s, when nations must be self-sufficient. If they lack a good then they'll invade another country to get it. So, the US is big enough to get most of what it needs from it's own land mass, but I guess China and India and Russia will carve up Asia and Africa and Australia while Europe may fall under the Russian bear's shadow. South America will form a giant state and probably rope in central America on anti-gringo hysteria. Finally, we'd end up with only a half dozen empires in the world
34 posted on 03/10/2004 5:05:50 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson